Large-scale MDO of a small satellite using a novel framework for the solution of coupled systems and their derivatives

Gradient-based multidisciplinary optimization is applied to a small satellite design problem. A novel MDO framework is developed by adopting a non-conventional definition of components which yields two key benefits for solving multidisciplinary analysis and optimization problems. The first is a unified solver which generalizes many existing methods for solving nonlinear and linear systems, and the second is an automated and efficient method for computing coupled derivatives. This framework is used to solve a small satellite optimization problem involving several disciplines including orbit dynamics, attitude dynamics, attitude control, temperature, solar power, battery, and communication. Multi-point optimizations involving over 35,000 design variables and 1.2 million unknowns require on the order of 5 hours to converge to significantly improved designs, and this efficient design optimization capability is used to compare potential launch options.

[1]  K. Naito,et al.  Simulation of I–V characteristics of a PV module with shaded PV cells , 2003 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Large-Scale Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Small Satellite’s Design and Operation , 2014 .

[3]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models , 2013 .

[4]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[5]  Danielle George,et al.  A system-based design methodology and architecture for highly adaptive small satellites , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Systems Conference.

[6]  Justin S. Gray,et al.  OpenMDAO: Framework for Flexible Multidisciplinary Design, Analysis and Optimization Methods , 2012 .

[7]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[8]  Lucy HOAG,et al.  A Systems Architecting Approach to Automation and Optimization of Satellite Design in SPIDR , 2010 .

[9]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[10]  S. R. Cvetkovic,et al.  Spacecraft design considerations for small satellite remote sensing , 1993 .

[11]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Geometry and structural modeling for high-fidelity aircraft conceptual design optimization , 2014 .

[13]  J Giesselmann,et al.  Development of an active magnetic attitude determination and control system for picosatellites on highly inclined circular low earth orbits , 2006 .

[14]  Sun Zhaowei,et al.  The integrated system for design, analysis, system simulation and evaluation of the small satellite , 2000 .

[15]  James Cutler,et al.  Cubesat Investigating Atmospheric Density Response to Extreme Driving (CADRE) , 2011 .

[16]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  Sara Spangelo,et al.  Integrated approach to optimizing small spacecraft vehicles and operations , 2011 .

[18]  G. F. Ashby,et al.  Integrated design, evaluation, and decision making for small satellite design , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[19]  C. R. Deboor,et al.  A practical guide to splines , 1978 .

[20]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[21]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A comparative evaluation of genetic and gradient-based algorithms applied to aerodynamic optimization , 2008 .