A cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of eHealth-supported patient recruitment in primary care research: the TRANSFoRm study protocol

BackgroundOpportunistic recruitment is a highly laborious and time-consuming process that is currently performed manually, increasing the workload of already busy practitioners and resulting in many studies failing to achieve their recruitment targets. The Translational Medicine and Patient Safety in Europe (TRANSFoRm) platform enables automated recruitment, data collection and follow-up of patients, potentially improving the efficiency, time and costs of clinical research. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of TRANSFoRm in improving patient recruitment and follow-up in primary care trials.Methods/designThis multi-centre, parallel-arm cluster randomised controlled trial will compare TRANSFoRm-supported with standard opportunistic recruitment. Participants will be general practitioners and patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease from 40 primary care centres in five European countries. Randomisation will take place at the care centre level. The intervention arm will use the TRANSFoRm tools for recruitment, baseline data collection and follow-up. The control arm will use web-based case report forms and paper self-completed questionnaires. The primary outcome will be the proportion of eligible patients successfully recruited at the end of the 16-week recruitment period. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of recruited patients with complete baseline and follow-up data and the proportion of participants withdrawn or lost to follow-up. The study will also include an economic evaluation and measures of technology acceptance and user experience.DiscussionThe study should shed light on the use of eHealth to improve the effectiveness of recruitment and follow-up in primary care research and provide an evidence base for future eHealth-supported recruitment initiatives. Reporting of results is expected in October 2015.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2014-001314-25

[1]  Pierre Frémont,et al.  Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[2]  R. Hornung,et al.  Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  D Elbourne,et al.  Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[4]  Maria Vargas-Vera,et al.  ePCRN-IDEA2: An Agent-Based System for Large-Scale Clinical Trial Recruitment , 2012 .

[5]  H. Prokosch,et al.  Perspectives for Medical Informatics , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  J. Parry,et al.  How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. , 2003, Family practice.

[7]  S. Treweek,et al.  Meeting the challenges of recruitment to multicentre, community-based, lifestyle-change trials: a case study of the BeWEL trial , 2013, Trials.

[8]  Vasa Curcin,et al.  Translational Medicine and Patient Safety in Europe: TRANSFoRm—Architecture for the Learning Health System in Europe , 2015, BioMed research international.

[9]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Atul J. Butte,et al.  Enrolling patients into clinical trials faster using RealTime Recuiting , 2000, AMIA.

[12]  David Glasspool,et al.  Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  P. Bower,et al.  Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. , 2009, Family practice.

[14]  J. Dent,et al.  Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review , 2005, Gut.

[15]  Peter Bower,et al.  Short report: how often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? , 2007, Family practice.

[16]  H. Prokosch,et al.  Applicability of Lewin´s Change Management Model in a Hospital Setting , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[17]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[18]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[20]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics , 2000 .

[21]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[22]  B. Delaney,et al.  General practice Randomised controlled trials in primary care : case study , 2022 .

[23]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics , 2006 .

[24]  Omar D. Fernandes,et al.  A comparative analysis of recruitment methods used in a randomized trial of diabetes education interventions. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  A. Searle,et al.  Evaluation of different recruitment and randomisation methods in a trial of general practitioner-led interventions to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled feasibility study with factorial design , 2014, Trials.