Monetisation of external socio-economic costs of industrial production: A social-LCA-based case of clothing production

Abstract The purpose of this study is to benchmark production processes and production chains of clothing products, by means of social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). In this paper we present the socio-economic costs (s-eco-costs) method for monetisation of external socio-economic burden for workers. The method is applied to six cases of garment production chains. The s-eco-costs are the marginal prevention costs to reach a sustainable level (the Performance Reference Point, PRP) for wages and are the monetary compensation costs beyond the PRP to account for unacceptable exploitation of workers. The s-eco-costs (in €) include five sub-indicators, proposed as a base-line for several social issues in S-LCA: - Minimum Acceptable Wage (based on minimum wages in rich countries and statistics on economic migrants) - Child Labour (forced labour, not able to attend school) - Extreme Poverty (derived from World Bank absolute poverty line) - Excessive Working Hours (forced labour, involuntary) - Occupational Safety and Health (based on statistics of ILO) These s-eco-costs have been calculated for cotton T-shirts and pairs of jeans for three garment production chains: USA-Europe (Western ‘W’); India-Bangladesh (Asian ‘A’); China/India-Bangladesh (Asian Best Practice ‘ABP’), revealing the hotspots in these chains, and enabling benchmarking. The total results for the s-eco-costs of T-shirts are: W = € 0.05; A = € 1.46 and ABP = € 0.33. The results for the jeans are: W = € 0.38; A = € 12.56 and ABP = € 2.67. The most important hotspots are in the cotton fields in India and the garment production phase in Bangladesh. The authors hope that the proposed system will inspire others in the field of S-LCA to proceed with the development of quantitative indicator systems.

[1]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Jean-Pierre Revéret,et al.  Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Gustav A Sandin,et al.  Environmental assessment of Swedish fashion consumption. Five garments – sustainable futures. , 2015 .

[6]  Saeed Mansour,et al.  Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  R. D. Mariani,et al.  Working Conditions in the Bangladeshi garment sector: Social dialogue and compliance , 2013 .

[8]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands , 2011 .

[9]  Andreas Jørgensen Social LCA—a way ahead? , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Poverty lines around the world: A new methodology and internationally comparable estimates , 2006 .

[11]  Sandra Roos,et al.  Is Unbleached Cotton Better Than Bleached? Exploring the Limits of Life-Cycle Assessment in the Textile Sector , 2015 .

[12]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[13]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes , 2010 .

[14]  Andreas R. Köhler,et al.  Life cycle assessment and eco-design of smart textiles: The importance of material selection demonstrated through e-textile product redesign , 2015 .

[15]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[16]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2006 .

[17]  J. Lave,et al.  Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Implications for Societal Health Care Resource Allocation , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  In search of income reference points for SLCA using a country level sustainability benchmark (part 1): fair inequality. A contribution to the Oiconomy project , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  R. Anker Living wages around the world: A new methodology and internationally comparable estimates , 2006 .

[20]  W. Vermeulen Self-Governance for Sustainable Global Supply Chains: Can it deliver the impacts needed? , 2015 .

[21]  C Mdr,et al.  Well dressed? The present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom. , 2006 .

[22]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective-Lessons learned , 2008 .

[23]  S. Seuring,et al.  Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance , 2013 .

[24]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[25]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  The virtual eco-costs ‘99 A single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the eco-costs-value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation , 2001 .

[26]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Social Life Cycle Assessment: State of the art and challenges for supporting product policies , 2015 .

[27]  Mark Leys,et al.  Using threshold values for cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained in healthcare decisions , 2011, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[28]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective , 2009 .

[29]  S. Grosse Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold , 2008, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[30]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[32]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  Osíris Canciglieri,et al.  Determining the principal references of the social life cycle assessment of products , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Jessica E. Leahy,et al.  Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Liselotte Schebek,et al.  Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA) , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Catherine Benoît Norris,et al.  Data for social LCA , 2014 .

[37]  Jasdev Singh,et al.  Optimization of energy input for raising cotton crop in Punjab , 2000 .

[38]  Silvia Di Cesare,et al.  Positive impacts and indicator categories in social life cycle assessment: results from a systematic review , 2015 .

[39]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Well dressed?: The present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom , 2015 .

[40]  Han Brezet,et al.  Communicating the eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value model , 2002 .

[41]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Sustainable supply chain governance systems: conditions for effective market based governance in global trade. , 2010 .

[42]  E. Hartmann,et al.  SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2010 .

[43]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Supply chain management for sustainable products – insights from research applying mixed methodologies , 2011 .