Strategy-Driven Business Process Analysis

Business Process Analysis (BPA) aims to verify, validate, and identify potential improvements for business processes. Despite the wide range of technologies developed so far, the large amount of information that needs to be integrated and processed, as well as the quantity of data that has to be produced and presented still poses important challenges both from a processing and presentation perspectives. We argue that to enhance BPA, semantics have to be the core backbone in order to better support the application of analysis techniques on the first hand, and to guide the computation and presentation of the results on the other hand. We propose a knowledge-based approach to supporting strategy-driven BPA by making use of a comprehensive and extensible ontological framework capturing from high-level strategic concerns down to lower-level monitoring information. We describe how corporate strategies can be operationalized into concrete analysis that can guide the evaluation of organisational processes, structure the presentation of results obtained and better help assess the well-being of corporate business processes.

[1]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  The Current State of Business Intelligence , 2007, Computer.

[2]  John Domingue,et al.  A Core Ontology for Business Process Analysis , 2008, ESWC.

[3]  Charles J. Petrie The TOVE Project: Towards a Common-Sense Model of the Enterprise , 1992 .

[4]  Detlef D. Nauck,et al.  Real Time Business Intelligence for the Adaptive Enterprise , 2006, The 8th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services (CEC/EEE'06).

[5]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic Web services for business process management , 2005, IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE'05).

[6]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Integrated decision support systems: A data warehousing perspective , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  David Jones,et al.  Corporate strategy , 1989, Nature.

[8]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models , 2003, J. Data Semant..

[9]  Carlos Pedrinaci,et al.  SENTINEL: a semantic business process monitoring tool , 2008, OBI '08.

[10]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Reusable components for knowledge modelling , 1998 .

[12]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Business Process Intelligence , 2009, Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling.

[13]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Fabio Casati,et al.  A Comprehensive and Automated Approach to Intelligent Business Processes Execution Analysis , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[15]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[16]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  The ProM Framework: A New Era in Process Mining Tool Support , 2005, ICATPN.

[17]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling: Case Studies in Parametric Design Problem Solving , 1999 .

[18]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Semantic Process Mining Tools: Core Building Blocks , 2008, ECIS.

[19]  Michael Zur Muehlen,et al.  Workflow-based Process Controlling - Or: What You Can Measure You Can Control , 2001 .

[20]  Gianfranco Ciardo,et al.  Applications and Theory of Petri Nets 2005, 26th International Conference, ICATPN 2005, Miami, USA, June 20-25, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ICATPN.