Framework for Knowledge–Based Intelligent Clinical Decisionsupport to Predict Comorbidity

Research in medicine has shown that comorbidity is prevalent among chronic diseases. In ophthalmology, it is used to refer to the overlap of two or more ophthalmic disorders. The comorbidity of cataract and glaucoma has continued to gain increasing prominence in ophthalmology within the past few decades and poses a major concern to practitioners. The situation is made worse by the dearth in number of ophthalmologists in Nigeria vis-a-vis Sub-Saharan Africa, making it most inevitable that patients will find themselves more at the mercies of General Practitioners (GPs) who are not experts in this domain of interest. To stem the tide, we designed a framework that adopts a knowledge-based Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) approach to deal with predicting ophthalmic comorbidity as well as the generation of patient-specific care plans at the point of care. This research which is within the domain of medical/healthcare informatics was carried out through an in- depth understanding of the intricacies associated with knowledge representation/preprocessing of relevant domain knowledge. Furthermore, we present the Comorbidity Ontological Framework for Intelligent Prediction (COFIP) in which Artificial Neural Network and Decision Trees, both being mechanisms of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was embedded into the framework to give it an intelligent (predictive and adaptive) capability. This framework provides the platform for a CDSS that is diagnostic, predictive and preventive. This is because the framework was designed to predict with satisfactory accuracy, the tendency of a patient with either of cataract or glaucoma to degenerate into a state comorbidity. Furthermore, because this framework is generic in outlook, it can be adapted for other chronic diseases of interest within the medical informatics research community.

[1]  A R Feinstein,et al.  THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE. , 1970, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  Geoffrey C. Bowker Biodiversity Datadiversity , 2000 .

[3]  Thomas Lee,et al.  Critical Pathways as a Strategy for Improving Care: Problems and Potential , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  The double role of ontologies in information science research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Enzo Grossi,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks and Predictive Medicine: a Revolutionary Paradigm Shift , 2011 .

[7]  C. Angeli,et al.  Diagnostic Expert Systems : From Expert ’ s Knowledge to Real-Time Systems , 2010 .

[8]  F. Eugene Yates,et al.  The national center for health statistics , 1973, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention , 2002, Neural Networks.

[11]  Wiley Interscience Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 2013 .

[12]  Sholom M. Weiss,et al.  Data-intensive analytics for predictive modeling , 2003, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[13]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Designing computer-based frameworks that facilitate doctor-patient collaboration , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[14]  R. Hotchkiss Integrated care pathways , 1997, BMJ.

[15]  Matthew N. Anyanwu,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Serial Decision Tree Classification Algorithms , 2009 .

[16]  S. Abidi A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK TO DEVELOP, MODEL, ALIGN AND OPERATIONALIZE CLINICAL PATHWAYS TO PROVIDE DECISION SUPPORT FOR COMORBID DISEASES , 2010 .

[17]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Integrating clinical practice guidelines into the routine of everyday practice. , 2005, Critical pathways in cardiology.