Discrete signal processing of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging: Statistical validation and preliminary clinical application

A high‐resolution image‐based method was developed to analyze dynamic contrast agent‐enhanced magnetic resonance images quantitatively. This method determines the initial rate of contrast agent accumulation, the delayed rate of accumulation, and the maximum enhancement in each pixel. These three parameters allow characterization of the dynamic signal features. Simulated noisy test sets of dynamic enhancement curves have shown this method to yield a fast and accurate characterization of the dynamic signal. Clinical examples of both qualitative image parameter maps and quantitative statistical analysis of the parameter distributions demonstrated the quality and potential of the technique. The technique is designed to yield imaging and quantitative information on contrast agent accumulation that can be useful in detecting residual tumor and evaluating response to therapy, while requiring less than 7 minutes of imaging time and 5 minutes of processing time per study.

[1]  J Kawamura,et al.  Pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue: enhancement patterns on gadopentetate-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[2]  F. Starr,et al.  Measurement of blood‐brain barrier permeability in a tumor model using magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium‐dtpa , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J P Heiken,et al.  Normal abdominal enhancement patterns with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  M. Reiser,et al.  Musculoskeletal neoplasms: static and dynamic Gd-DTPA--enhanced MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[5]  J. Heiken,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver. , 1991, Radiology.

[6]  P. Peters,et al.  Response of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. , 1990, Radiology.

[7]  P. R. Fisk,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1971 .

[8]  S A Gronemeyer,et al.  Pediatric musculoskeletal tumors: use of dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging to monitor response to chemotherapy. , 1992, Radiology.

[9]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. , 1989, Radiology.

[10]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  J. Heiken,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the spleen: normal enhancement patterns and evaluation of splenic lesions. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  B. L. Neff,et al.  Bone marrow perfusion evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic fast MR imaging in a dog model. , 1991, Radiology.

[13]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  J. Lee,et al.  Renal masses: evaluation with gradient-echo Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[15]  W. Reddick,et al.  Automated pixel‐by‐pixel mapping of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR images for evaluation of osteosarcoma response to chemotherapy: Preliminary results , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  P. Terrier,et al.  Osteosarcoma after chemotherapy: evaluation with contrast material-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[18]  E Tomei,et al.  Obstructive nephropathy: evaluation with dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[19]  D. Fairclough,et al.  Assessment of Osteosarcoma Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy Using Dynamic FLASH Gadolinium-DTPA–Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Mapping , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[20]  B Hamm,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  L W Hedlund,et al.  Detection of acute avascular necrosis of the femoral head in dogs: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging vs spin-echo and STIR sequences. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  R. Semelka,et al.  Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. , 1991, Radiology.

[23]  W. Steinbrich,et al.  Adrenal masses: evaluation with fast gradient-echo MR imaging and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic studies. , 1989, Radiology.

[24]  K J Wolf,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. , 1990, Radiology.

[25]  O Henriksen,et al.  Quantitation of blood‐brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium‐DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[27]  Noninvasive determination of regional cerebral blood flow in rats using dynamic imaging with Gd(DTPA) , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  M Takahashi,et al.  Normal and abnormal pituitary glands: gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[29]  J. Frahm,et al.  Absolute concentrations of metabolites in the adult human brain in vivo: quantification of localized proton MR spectra. , 1993, Radiology.