Interpreting Differences in Radiative Feedbacks From Aerosols Versus Greenhouse Gases

Experiments with seven Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 models were used to assess the climate feedback parameter for net historical, historical greenhouse gas (GHG) and anthropogenic aerosol forcings. The net radiative feedback is found to be more amplifying (higher effective climate sensitivity) for aerosol than GHG forcing, and hence also less amplifying for net historical (GHG + aerosol) than GHG only. We demonstrate that this difference is consistent with their different latitudinal distributions. Historical aerosol forcing is most pronounced in northern extratropics, where the boundary layer is decoupled from the free troposphere, so the consequent temperature change is confined to low altitude and causes low‐level cloud changes. This is caused by change in stability, which also affects upper‐tropospheric clear‐sky emission, affecting both shortwave and longwave radiative feedbacks. This response is a feature of extratropical forcing generally, regardless of its sign or hemisphere.

[1]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Suppressed Late‐20th Century Warming in CMIP6 Models Explained by Forcing and Feedbacks , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[2]  A. Wing,et al.  Understanding the Extreme Spread in Climate Sensitivity within the Radiative‐Convective Equilibrium Model Intercomparison Project , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[3]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Effective Radiative Forcing in a GCM With Fixed Surface Temperatures , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[4]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  K. Taylor,et al.  Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[6]  T. Andrews,et al.  Efficacy of Climate Forcings in PDRMIP Models , 2019, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[7]  J. Gregory,et al.  A refined model for the Earth’s global energy balance , 2019, Climate Dynamics.

[8]  M. Webb,et al.  How accurately can the climate sensitivity to CO2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$\end{ , 2019, Climate Dynamics.

[9]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Accounting for Changing Temperature Patterns Increases Historical Estimates of Climate Sensitivity , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[10]  M. Webb,et al.  The Dependence of Global Cloud and Lapse Rate Feedbacks on the Spatial Structure of Tropical Pacific Warming , 2018 .

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Analyzing the dependence of global cloud feedback on the spatial pattern of sea surface temperature change with a Green's function approach , 2017 .

[12]  M. Zelinka,et al.  Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models , 2017 .

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Impact of decadal cloud variations on the Earth/'s energy budget , 2016 .

[14]  Robert Pincus,et al.  The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental Protocol for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[15]  B. Rose,et al.  The Effects of Ocean Heat Uptake on Transient Climate Sensitivity , 2016, Current Climate Change Reports.

[16]  T. Andrews,et al.  Variation in climate sensitivity and feedback parameters during the historical period , 2016 .

[17]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings , 2016 .

[18]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  M. Webb,et al.  The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models , 2015 .

[20]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Tropical temperature trends in Atmospheric General Circulation Model simulations and the impact of uncertainties in observed SSTs , 2014 .

[21]  M. Webb,et al.  Global‐mean radiative feedbacks and forcing in atmosphere‐only and coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate change experiments , 2014 .

[22]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change , 2014 .

[23]  D. Shindell.  Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity , 2014 .

[24]  D. Battisti,et al.  The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake , 2014 .

[25]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[26]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[27]  Isaac M. Held,et al.  Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change , 2010 .

[28]  C. Bretherton,et al.  On the Relationship between Stratiform Low Cloud Cover and Lower-Tropospheric Stability , 2006 .

[29]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The ENSO Signal in Tropical Tropospheric Temperature , 2002 .

[30]  K. Shine.  Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[31]  V. Pope,et al.  The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3 , 2000 .

[32]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[33]  D. Hartmann.  Global Physical Climatology , 1994 .