Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography (CTA) across different commercial analysis platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this study, 47 patients (36 men, 11 women; mean age ± SD, 62 ± 13 years) with noncalcified plaques on coronary CTA were included. Automated quantification of noncalcified coronary artery plaque volume was performed on identical datasets using three commercially available image analysis software platforms (software platforms 1-3). Identical tissue attenuation ranges between 0 and 50 HU for low-attenuation plaques and 50-130 HU for medium-attenuation plaques were consistently applied. Log volume data were compared with the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Differences in plaque volume measurements on intraplatform repeat measurements were statistically insignificant (p = 0.923). At the low-attenuation threshold, software platform 3 had significantly higher log volumes (p < 0.001) than both software platforms 1 and 2 and software platform 1 had significantly higher log volumes than software platform 2 (p < 0.001). The results at the medium-attenuation level were identical except that the log volumes for software platforms 1 and 2 were not significantly different (p > 0.05) in the left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery. The Pearson correlation coefficient was found to be 0.677 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.608-0.735) between software platforms 1 and 2, 0.672 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.603-0.732) between software platforms 1 and 3, and 0.550 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.463-0.627) between software platforms 2 and 3. CONCLUSION Currently available noncalcified plaque quantification software provides good intraplatform reproducibility but poor interplatform reproducibility. Serial or comparative assessments require evaluation using the same software. Industry standards should be developed to enable reproducible assessments across manufacturers.

[1]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris determined by contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  R. Virmani,et al.  Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Evaluation of an improved technique for lumen path definition and lumen segmentation of atherosclerotic vessels in CT angiography , 2006, European Radiology.

[4]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Reply: methodologic concerns in reliability of noncalcified coronary artery plague burden quantification. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Michael T. Lu,et al.  Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain--Results from the ROMICAT II trial. , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  Chun-Shan Yam,et al.  Measuring noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque using voxel analysis with MDCT angiography: a pilot clinical study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  澤田 隆弘,et al.  Feasibility of combined use of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis and optical coherence tomography for detecting thin-cap fibroatheroma , 2008 .

[8]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[9]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Computed tomography imaging of coronary artery plaque: characterization and prognosis. , 2015, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[10]  D. Berman,et al.  Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Satoshi Watanabe,et al.  Feasibility of combined use of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis and optical coherence tomography for detecting thin-cap fibroatheroma. , 2008, European heart journal.

[13]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Dey,et al.  Quantification and Characterisation of Coronary Artery Plaque Volume and Adverse Plaque Features by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Direct Comparison to Intravascular Ultrasound , 2013 .

[15]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  In vivo intravascular ultrasound-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma detection using ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  P. Yock,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. , 2001, Circulation.

[17]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[19]  Measuring noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque using voxel analysis with MDCT angiography: phantom validation. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  J. Beckman,et al.  Relationship of Clinical Presentation and Calcification of Culprit Coronary Artery Stenoses , 2001, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[21]  Yoon-Sok Chung,et al.  Quantification of visceral fat using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and its reliability according to the amount of visceral fat in Korean adults. , 2015, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[22]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  How to assess non-calcified plaque in CT angiography: delineation methods affect diagnostic accuracy of low-attenuation plaque by CT for lipid-core plaque in histology. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[23]  Michael T. Lu,et al.  Effects of statin therapy on coronary artery plaque volume and high-risk plaque morphology in HIV-infected patients with subclinical atherosclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2015, The lancet. HIV.

[24]  P. Shah,et al.  Pravastatin Treatment Increases Collagen Content and Decreases Lipid Content, Inflammation, Metalloproteinases, and Cell Death in Human Carotid Plaques: Implications for Plaque Stabilization , 2001, Circulation.

[25]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[26]  H. Guski,et al.  Quantification of atherosclerotic coronary plaque components by submillimeter computed tomography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[27]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Evaluation of an improved technique for automated center lumen line definition in cardiovascular image data , 2005, European Radiology.

[28]  Bálint Szilveszter,et al.  Plaque assessment by coronary CT , 2015, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[29]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound , 2003, Circulation.

[30]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[31]  Gorka Bastarrika,et al.  Reproducibility of Automated Noncalcified Coronary Artery Plaque Burden Assessment at Coronary CT Angiography , 2009, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[32]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary plaque burden using multislice computed tomography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  K. Toutouzas,et al.  Imaging of the vulnerable plaque: noninvasive and invasive techniques. , 2008, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[34]  S. Sabour.  Methodologic concerns in reliability of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT , 2003, European Radiology.

[36]  M F Reiser,et al.  Imaging of noncalcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  P. Maurovich-Horvat,et al.  High Risk Plaque Features on Coronary CT Angiography , 2014, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[38]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[39]  Ho Yub Jung,et al.  Geodesic Distance Algorithm for Extracting the Ascending Aorta from 3D CT Images , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[40]  Friedrich D Knollmann,et al.  Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in human coronary arteries with 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography by analysis of attenuation profiles. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[41]  P. Libby.  Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndromes. , 1995, Circulation.

[42]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[43]  Matthias F Kriegel,et al.  Differentiation of early from advanced coronary atherosclerotic lesions: systematic comparison of CT, intravascular US, and optical frequency domain imaging with histopathologic examination in ex vivo human hearts. , 2012, Radiology.

[44]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  R. Virmani,et al.  Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[47]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Influence of a Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Plaques Monitored by Multislice Detector Computed Tomography: Results of the New Age II Pilot Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[48]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. , 2008, Atherosclerosis.

[50]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  Additive value of semiautomated quantification of coronary artery disease using cardiac computed tomographic angiography to predict future acute coronary syndrome. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.