Counterconditioning reduces cue-induced craving and actual cue-elicited consumption.

Cue-induced craving is not easily reduced by an extinction or exposure procedure and may constitute an important route toward relapse in addictive behavior after treatment. In the present study, we investigated the effectiveness of counterconditioning as an alternative procedure to reduce cue-induced craving, in a nonclinical population. We found that a cue, initially paired with chocolate consumption, did not cease to elicit craving for chocolate after extinction (repeated presentation of the cue without chocolate consumption), but did so after counterconditioning (repeated pairing of the cue with consumption of a highly disliked liquid, Polysorbate 20). This effect persisted after 1 week. Counterconditioning moreover was more effective than extinction in disrupting reported expectancy to get to eat chocolate, and also appeared to be more effective in reducing actual cue-elicited chocolate consumption. These results suggest that counterconditioning may be more promising than cue exposure for the prevention of relapse in addictive behavior.

[1]  G. Stricker.  American Psychological Association Code of Ethics , 2010 .

[2]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Changing likes and dislikes through the back door: The US-revaluation effect , 2009 .

[3]  O. Van den Bergh,et al.  Conditioned craving cues elicit an automatic approach tendency. , 2008, Behaviour research and therapy.

[4]  O. Van den Bergh,et al.  Return of experimentally induced chocolate craving after extinction in a different context: divergence between craving for and expecting to eat chocolate. , 2008, Behaviour research and therapy.

[5]  Dinska Van Gucht,et al.  Repeated cue exposure effects on subjective and physiological indices of chocolate craving , 2008, Appetite.

[6]  M. Kindt,et al.  Contextual control of human fear associations in a renewal paradigm. , 2007, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  V. Lolordo,et al.  Unconditioned stimulus devaluation effects in nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  T. Piasecki.  Relapse to smoking. , 2006, Clinical psychology review.

[9]  Dominic Michael Dwyer.  Reinforcer devaluation in palatability-based learned flavor preferences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  Matt Field,et al.  Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. , 2003, Addiction.

[11]  M. Bouton.  Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  T. Brandon,et al.  Effects of extinction context and retrieval cues on alcohol cue reactivity among nonalcoholic drinkers. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  S. Tiffany,et al.  Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. , 2002, Addiction.

[14]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[16]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  Counterconditioning in the treatment of spider phobia: effects on disgust, fear and valence. , 2000, Behaviour research and therapy.

[17]  P. Rogers,et al.  Food Craving and Food “Addiction” A Critical Review of the Evidence From a Biopsychosocial Perspective , 2000, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[18]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Evaluative conditioning in the picture-picture paradigm with random assignment of conditioned stimuli to unconditioned stimuli. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  J. L. Calton,et al.  Attenuation of the Renewal Effect by Extinction in Multiple Contexts , 1999 .

[20]  A. Jansen,et al.  A learning model of binge eating: cue reactivity and cue exposure. , 1998, Behaviour research and therapy.

[21]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse. , 1998, Behaviour research and therapy.

[22]  M. Bouton,et al.  A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. , 1994 .

[23]  Maria Lewicka,et al.  Positive‐negative asymmetry or ‘When the heart needs a reason’ , 1992 .

[24]  G. Crombez,et al.  The Content of Learning in Human Evaluative Conditioning: Acquired Valence Is Sensitive to US-Revaluation , 1992 .

[25]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Food cravings in a college population , 1991, Appetite.

[26]  S. Cooper.  Chemical Dependency and Eating Disorders: Are They Really so Different? , 1989 .

[27]  R. Bolles,et al.  Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear , 1979 .

[28]  R. Rescorla,et al.  The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  Dinska Van Gucht,et al.  Return of experimentally induced chocolate craving after extinction: Divergence between craving and US-expectancy , 2007 .

[30]  Bram Vervliet,et al.  Resistance to extinction in evaluative conditioning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  Erik W. Moody,et al.  Counteracting the Context-Dependence of Extinction: Relapse and Tests of Some Relapse Prevention Methods. , 2006 .

[32]  B. Vervliet,et al.  Renewal and reinstatement of fear: Evidence from human conditioning research , 2006 .

[33]  M. Craske,et al.  Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications. , 2006 .

[34]  G. Crombez,et al.  Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: differential effects of extinction , 2003 .

[35]  D. Hermans,et al.  Chilled white wine, when all of a sudden the doorbell rings: Mere reference and evaluation versus expectancy and preparation in human Pavlovian learning , 2001 .

[36]  S. Tiffany.  Cognitive Concepts of Craving , 1999, Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

[37]  G. Marlatt,et al.  Addictive behaviour: Cue exposure theory and practice. , 1995 .

[38]  O. Van den Bergh,et al.  Acquired affective-evaluative value: conservative but not unchangeable. , 1989, Behaviour research and therapy.