Modern Anchorage Systems in Orthodontics

Anchorage has been a vital topic since the origin of orthodontics. In the orthodontic process, gentle, constant pressure is applied to the teeth that need to be moved against the other teeth, which serve as the anchoring unit. The anchoring teeth must be completely stable. The introduction of temporary anchorage devices to the orthodontic field has made it possible to overcome conventional anchorage and its limitations. Mini implants have widened the horizon of the orthodontic field. Skeletal anchorage has, to a large degree, replaced conventional anchorage in a situation where anchorage is considered either critical, insufficient, or likely to result in undesirable side effects such as vertical displacements generated by intermaxillary force systems. Over the last few years, anchorage control with mini-implants has acquired plenty of significance in the clinical management of orthodontic patients. The mode of anchorage facilitated by these implant systems has a unique characteristic owing to their temporary use, which results in a transient, albeit absolute anchorage. The foregoing properties, together with the recently achieved simple application of these screws, have increased their popularity, establishing them as a necessary treatment option in complex cases that would have otherwise been impossible to treat. This comprehensive review aims to present and discuss the historical view, clinical uses, benefits, and drawbacks of the mini-screw implants used to obtain a temporary anchorage for orthodontic applications. Topics to be discussed include classification, types and properties, types of screw, head, and thread, their clinical applications, sites, and placement method selection.

[1]  Rithika Joseph,et al.  Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A review , 2020, IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research.

[2]  Abhishek M. Thote,et al.  OPTIMUM FORCE SYSTEM FOR EN-MASSE RETRACTION OF SIX MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH IN LABIAL ORTHODONTICS , 2020 .

[3]  S. Yadav,et al.  Preface , 2020, Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.

[4]  M. Hajeer,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2019, Dental and medical problems.

[5]  M. Hajeer,et al.  En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[6]  M. Hajeer,et al.  Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2018, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[7]  A. Al-Jundi,et al.  Efficiency of Er:YAG utilization in accelerating deep bite orthodontic treatment. , 2018, Laser therapy.

[8]  Yimei Zhang,et al.  Implants for orthodontic anchorage , 2018, Medicine.

[9]  B. Ludwig The Possibility of Skeletal Anchorage. , 2017, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[10]  E. Mizrahi The use of Miniscrews in Orthodontics: A Review of Selected Clinical Applications , 2016, Primary dental journal.

[11]  M. Hajeer,et al.  The Removable Mandibular Retractor vs the Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction in the Correction of skeletal class III Malocclusion in children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2016, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[12]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects. , 2015, Periodontology 2000.

[13]  S. Papageorgiou,et al.  49 – Success rates and risk factors of miniscrew implants used as temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic purposes , 2015 .

[14]  A. Muhamad,et al.  Miniscrews: Clinical Application of Orthodontic. , 2014 .

[15]  A. Caprioglio,et al.  Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects , 2014, Progress in Orthodontics.

[16]  M. Hajeer,et al.  Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  C. Abraham A Brief Historical Perspective on Dental Implants, Their Surface Coatings and Treatments , 2014, The open dentistry journal.

[18]  M. Motoyoshi,et al.  Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  Mi-Ae Jeong,et al.  Effect of Orthodontics Patients' Orthodontics Characteristics on the Living Quality Related to Oral Health (OHIP) , 2014 .

[20]  Jeffrey M Shirck,et al.  Temporary anchorage device utilization: comparison of usage in orthodontic programs and private practice. , 2011, Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement.

[21]  Shigemi Goto,et al.  Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[22]  R. Ruiz,et al.  Temporary skeletal anchorage devices for orthodontics. , 2010, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[23]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  Temporary anchorage devices – Mini-implants , 2010, National journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[24]  R. Nanda,et al.  Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics , 2008 .

[25]  Michael S Reddy,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[26]  Paul W Major,et al.  Vertical bone volume in the paramedian palate of adolescents: a computed tomography study. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  Seong-Hun Kim,et al.  Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  Moschos A Papadopoulos,et al.  The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[29]  Y. Choi,et al.  Esthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  B. Kusnoto,et al.  Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  A. Karaman,et al.  Comparison of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[32]  Benedict Wilmes,et al.  Parameters Affecting Primary Stability of Orthodontic Mini-implants , 2006, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[33]  W. Lobb Group Distal Movement of Teeth Using Microscrew Implant AnchoragePark H-S, Lee S-K, Kwon O-W (Kyungpook Natl Univ, Jung-Gu, Daegu, Korea) Angle Orthod 75:602–609, 2005§ , 2006 .

[34]  Hyo-sang Park,et al.  Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[35]  Robert F Wright,et al.  Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[36]  Jason B. Cope,et al.  Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A paradigm shift , 2005 .

[37]  H. Wehrbein,et al.  Das Orthosystem — Ein neues Implantatsystem zur orthodontischen Verankerung am Gaumen , 1996, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[38]  D. Burden,et al.  Orthodontic treatment of patients with medical disorders. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[39]  L. Mair,et al.  A clinical study of space closure with nickel-titanium closed coil springs and an elastic module. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[40]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[41]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[42]  C. Bain,et al.  Smoking and implant failure--benefits of a smoking cessation protocol. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[43]  Bain Ca,et al.  The association between the failure of dental implants and cigarette smoking. , 1994 .

[44]  J. Wennström,et al.  Periodontal tissue response to orthodontic movement of teeth with infrabony pockets. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.