Locoregional options in the management of cholangiocarcinoma: single center experience.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this case series is to assess the safety and efficacy, as well as the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with percutaneous ablation, transarterial arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or a combination of both at our institution. METHODS Ten patients with pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma treated at out institution between January 1st 2013 and January 1st 2019 were reviewed. Three patients received a combined TACE and ablation treatment, three patients received TACE without ablation and four patients were treated with ablation only. Ablation technical success was determined by absence of residual tumor in the ablation zone on follow-up imaging one-month post-ablation. TACE response was assessed using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Technical success was defined as injection of chemoembolic material in the involved liver lobes. PFS and OS were calculated from the date of diagnosis. RESULTS In the TACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group, OS was 12, 55 and 56 months; PFS was 5, 6 and 32 months, one patient died and two others remain alive. In the TACE group, OS was 29, 10 and 5 months; PFS was 15, 10 and 4 months. All three patients remain alive. In the ablation group, OS and PFS were 16, 31, 30 and 40 months. All patients remain alive. Overall, 9 of 10 patients are alive, with a Median OS and PFS of 29.5 and 15.5 months, respectively, with some patients remain alive over four years following initial presentation. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that ablation and TACE in combination with more traditional modalities such as chemoradiation and surgical resection can extend survival in patients with ICC significantly. Locoregional therapy is well tolerated with only minor adverse events. The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with ablation demonstrated the synergistic nature of using multiple lines of interventions.

[1]  J. Ijzermans,et al.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current perspectives , 2017, OncoTargets and therapy.

[2]  M. Reni,et al.  Chemoembolization with drug eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) vs doxorubicin (DEBDOX) as a second line treatment for liver metastases from cholangiocarcinoma: a preliminary study. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  P. Kim,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  K. Kondo,et al.  Metaanalysis of survival, complications, and imaging response following chemotherapy-based transarterial therapy in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[5]  J. Trojan,et al.  Transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: Results and prognostic factors governing treatment success , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[6]  I-S Lee,et al.  Transarterial chemoembolization versus supportive therapy in the palliative treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[7]  G. Benea,et al.  Chemoembolization (TACE) of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Slow-Release Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads: Preliminary Results , 2008, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[8]  M. Choti,et al.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: initial experience in a single institution. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[9]  S. Fan,et al.  Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma , 1997, World Journal of Surgery.