Clustering Biotech: A Recipe for Success? Spatial Patterns of Growth of Biotechnology in Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg

The dynamic growth of biotechnology in Germany in recent years has an obviously spatial pattern. Some regions show a substantial potential for start-ups and young firms of this new industry whereas others lag behind. The paper is discussing this unequal spatial development elaborating perspectives which derive from recent debates about regional innovation systems. The biotech regions Munich and Rhineland, both winner regions of the BioRegio Competition are described and compared with the situation in Hamburg where biotechnology is much less important. We analyze the degree and relevance of locally integrated input-output relations of innovation systems based on typologies of the wide range of firms within the biotechnological value chain and the forms of co-operation. Moreover, a qualitative estimate is given with respect to the significance of untraded relationships and regional knowledge spillovers. Factors favoring local integration are compared with those favoring input-output systems on a transatlantic scale. The paper discusses the question whether the biotech industries in the regions of Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg represent identifiable regional systems of innovation.Our findings show that the spatial concentration does not necessarily imply a close network of input-output relations within a cluster. Knowledge and technology transfer often happens on a international, mostly on the North Atlantic scale. The exchange of tacit knowledge, however, is facilitated by spatial proximity. This underlines the importance of untraded relations and "relational assets" in a region. Political and institutional support for building a "business community" can reduce barriers to launch risky commercialization processes.

[1]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[2]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[3]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[4]  E. Blakely,et al.  Incubating High-Technology Firms: State Economic Development Strategies for Biotechnology , 1992 .

[5]  Kelvin W. Willoughby.  Technology and the Competitive Advantage of Regions: A Study of the Biotechnology Industry in the New York State , 1993 .

[6]  B. Harrison,et al.  Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility. , 1995 .

[7]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[8]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[9]  G. Pisano.  The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry☆ , 1991 .

[10]  Harvey Molotch,et al.  The Regional World , 1998 .

[11]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[12]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[13]  Ash Amin,et al.  The Re-Emergence of Regional Economies? The Mythical Geography of Flexible Accumulation , 1990 .

[14]  B. Harrison,et al.  Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: The changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s , 1991 .

[15]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[16]  Ann Markusen,et al.  Studying Regions by Studying Firms , 1994 .

[17]  J. Howells.  Regional Systems of Innovation , 1999 .

[18]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[19]  Rolf Sternberg.  DIE KONZEPTE DER FLEXIBLEN PRODUKTION UND DER INDUSTRIE DISTRIKTE ALS ERKLARUNGSANSATZE DER REGIONALENTWICKLUNG1) , 1995 .

[20]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Introduction: Origins of the Concept , 1998 .

[21]  E. Schoenberger.  THE CORPORATE INTERVIEW AS A RESEARCH METHOD IN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY , 1991 .

[22]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[23]  J. Devine.  Lean and Mean , 1996 .

[24]  M. Healey,et al.  Interviewing business owners and managers: a review of methods and techniques , 1993 .

[25]  M. Storper.  The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade , 1992 .

[26]  Christian Zeller,et al.  The Biotech Region of Munich and the Spatial Organisation of its Innovation Networks , 2002 .

[27]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[28]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[29]  A. Wood.  THE CAPITALIST IMPERATIVE: TERRITORY, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH , 1993 .

[30]  Stl Systemtechnik Ludwig,et al.  Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie , 2000 .

[31]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[32]  N. Thrift,et al.  Living In The Global , 1994 .

[33]  E. Parker,et al.  Industrial Change and Regional Development: The Case of the US Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[34]  Winfried Ruigrok,et al.  The logic of international restructuring , 1995 .

[35]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[36]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  ‘Biological’ revolution and strategies for innovation in pharmaceutical companies , 1993 .

[37]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Technological globalisation or national systems of innovation , 1997 .