Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments

PurposeAlthough total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is regularly associated with favorable outcomes, considerable research efforts are still underway to improve its ability to achieve a neutral postoperative mechanical axis. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced with this and other goals in mind. The current retrospective study was designed to determine whether PSI would lead to a hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) within ±3° of the ideal alignment of 180°.MethodsA long-leg x-ray of the knee was performed after an average of 3.5 months (SD, three to four months), following 124 TKAs performed by a single surgeon using PSI technology (VISIONAIRE; Smith & Nephew). In addition to HKA, the zone of the mechanical axis (ZMA; zone of the tibial base plate where the mechanical axis of the limb intersects with the tibial base plate) was analysed, with the ideal intersection occurring centrally.ResultsThere were 100 knees (average age, 66.8 years) with follow-up data available. The average HKA changed from 175.5±5.6° preoperatively to 178.5±1.7° postoperatively. The rate of ±3° and ±5° HKA outliers was 11 % and 3 %, respectively. In terms of ZMA, the mechanical axis passed through the central third of the knee in the majority of cases (93 knees, 93 %). There were no intra-operative complications with the use of PSI.ConclusionsThe use of PSI technology was able to achieve a neutral mechanical axis on average in patients undergoing TKA. Further follow-up will be needed to ascertain the long-term impact of these findings.

[1]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[5]  Frederick W Werner,et al.  The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  B B Seedhom,et al.  Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  Gerard A Engh,et al.  Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  William J Hozack,et al.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  Robert A Siston,et al.  Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. , 2008, Orthopedics.

[10]  A. DiGioia,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement , 2008 .

[11]  Alexander Giurea,et al.  Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. , 2008, The Knee.

[12]  J M Sikorski,et al.  Alignment in total knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[14]  Shameem A C Sampath,et al.  The statistical relationship between varus deformity, surgeon's experience, BMI and tourniquet time for computer assisted total knee replacements. , 2009, The Knee.

[15]  K. Saleh,et al.  Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments , 2010, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[16]  R. Barrack,et al.  Do Patient-specific Guides Improve Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides? , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[18]  P. Cerveri,et al.  Is computer-assisted total knee replacement for beginners or experts? Prospective study among three groups of patients treated by surgeons with different levels of experience , 2012, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[19]  T. Cheng,et al.  Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. , 2012, The Knee.

[20]  Ning Liu,et al.  The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  Darryl D D'Lima,et al.  Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Knee.

[22]  Andrea Ferretti,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Alignment With Patient-specific Positioning Guides Compared With Manual Instrumentation in TKA , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Carsten O Tibesku,et al.  Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. , 2014, The Knee.