In-line E-beam metrology and defect inspection: industry reflections, hybrid E-beam opportunities, recommendations and predictions

At SPIE 2013 in Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography an invited paper was published titled “In-line E-beam wafer metrology and defect inspection: the end of an era for image-based critical dimensional metrology? New life for defect inspection”. Three years have passed and numerous developments have occurred as predicted in this paper. The development of E-beam tools that can concurrently handle metrology and defect applications is one of the primary developments. In this paper, the capabilities of these new E-beam tools and their current use cases will be discussed in the areas of Critical Dimension Uniformity (CDU), In-die overlay, Hot spot and Physical defect inspection. Emphasis will be placed on use cases where “massive” CDU data is collected in order to increase yield learning for manufacturing (14nm) and decrease cycles of learning for development (7nm). Additionally, some of the other subject material from the previous publication will also be discussed such as the current state of E-beam critical dimension image fidelity and physical defect detection capabilities. Lastly, future directions and opportunities for In-line E-beam including Multi-beam and/or Multi-column E-beam will be discussed.

[1]  D. Joy.  SMART – a program to measure SEM resolution and imaging performance , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  Aaron Cordes,et al.  Gaps analysis for CD metrology beyond the 22nm node , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Fei Wang,et al.  E-beam inspection for combination use of defect detection and CD measurement , 2012, 2012 SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference.

[4]  Hiroshi Kakibayashi,et al.  Chapter 4 – Hitachi's Development of Cold-Field Emission Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopes , 2009 .

[5]  Aron Cepler,et al.  Improving the performance of the critical dimension-scanning electron microscope with the contrast transfer function , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Bryan J. Rice,et al.  CD metrology for the 45-nm and 32-nm nodes , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Tomasz Garbowski,et al.  Multi-beam SEM technology for ultra-high throughput , 2015, Other Conferences.

[8]  Richard H. Livengood,et al.  Helium ion microscope invasiveness and imaging study for semiconductor applications , 2007 .

[9]  Timothy F. Crimmins.  Defect metrology challenges at the 11-nm node and beyond , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  M. Malac,et al.  Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. , 2004, Micron.

[11]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  New apparent beam width artifact and measurement methodology for CD-SEM resolution monitoring , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Hidehito Obayashi.  In celebration of the 60th anniversary of Journal of Electron Microscopy. , 2011, Journal of electron microscopy.

[13]  Richard H. Livengood,et al.  Subsurface damage from helium ions as a function of dose, beam energy, and dose rate , 2009 .

[14]  F. Delachat,et al.  Process highlights to enhance DSA contact patterning performances , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Benjamin Bunday,et al.  CD-SEM parameter influence on image resolution and measurement accuracy , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  G. McCracken,et al.  The behaviour of surfaces under ion bombardment , 1975 .

[17]  Alok Vaid,et al.  In-line E-beam wafer metrology and defect inspection: the end of an era for image-based critical dimensional metrology? New life for defect inspection , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Atsuko Yamaguchi,et al.  Evolution and Future of Critical Dimension Measurement System for Semiconductor Processes , 2011 .

[19]  Ilan Englard,et al.  Accurate in-resolution level overlay metrology for multipatterning lithography techniques , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[20]  D. Joy,et al.  Protons, ions, electrons and the future of the SEM , 2010 .