Understanding Wheel Spinning in the Context of Affective Factors

The notion of wheel spinning, students getting stuck in the mastery learning cycle of an ITS without mastering the skill, is an emerging issue. Although wheel spinning has been analyzed, there has been little work in understanding what factors underlie it, and whether it occurs in cultural contexts outside that of the United States. This work is an extension of an earlier analysis of 116 students in an urban setting in the Philippines. The authors found that Filipino students using the Scatterplot Tutor exhibited wheel spinning behaviors. The authors explored the impact of an intervention, Scooter the Tutor, on wheel spinning behavior and did not find that it had any effect. They also analyzed data from quantitative field observations, and found that wheel spinning is prevented by engaged concentration, caused by confusion, but not causally related to boredom. This result suggests that the problem of wheel spinning is primarily cognitive in nature, and not related to student motivation. However, wheel spinning was positively correlated with gaming the system, and causal analysis suggests that wheel spinning causes gaming.

[1]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Towards Understanding How to Assess Help-Seeking Behavior Across Cultures , 2015, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[2]  Steven Ritter,et al.  Optimal and Worst-Case Performance of Mastery Learning Assessment with Bayesian Knowledge Tracing , 2013, EDM.

[3]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Software Agent on Student Affective Dynamics while Using ;an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[4]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  The Fine-Grained Impact of Gaming (?) on Learning , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[6]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Is Over Practice Necessary? - Improving Learning Efficiency with the Cognitive Tutor through Educational Data Mining , 2007, AIED.

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor , 2004 .

[10]  James H. Block,et al.  1: Mastery Learning , 1976 .

[11]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Understanding Wheel Spinning in the Context of Affective Factors , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[12]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[13]  Theodore W. Frick,et al.  A Comparison of Three Decision Models for Adapting the Length of Computer-Based Mastery Tests , 1990 .

[14]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[15]  Yue Gong,et al.  Wheel-Spinning: Students Who Fail to Master a Skill , 2013, AIED.

[16]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Relationship between Carelessness and Affect in a Cognitive Tutor , 2011, ACII.

[17]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Comparing Disengaged Behavior within a Cognitive Tutor in the USA and Philippines , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.