Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique

The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured decision-making technique widely used both in industry and academia as a tool to aid in planning and decision-making processes. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of NGT in a web-based environment compared to its traditional counterpart. Comparisons were made along several performance and process-related dimensions. First, the decision process and experimental methodology are introduced. Second, the interface design used during the online sessions is described. Next, the response variables were explored following two difference approaches. The first approach compared the response variables from the traditional and the online setting. The second approach assessed the differences in perceived values before and after the session was conducted. Results revealed that the traditional NGT outperformed the online version in the variables related to the process. However, traditional groups did not significantly differ from online groups with respect to the variables related to the outcomes. Finally, we suggest conditions for enhanced productivity in idea-generating and problem-solving groups by providing some sustaining evidence.

[1]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[2]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[4]  P. Paulus.  Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[5]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[6]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[8]  M. Kochen,et al.  Psychological Testing by Computer: Effect On Response Bias , 1970 .

[9]  S. Millstein,et al.  Acceptability and Reliability of Sensitive Information Collected via Computer Interview , 1987 .

[10]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[13]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[14]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems , 1999, DATB.

[15]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[16]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[17]  Linda M. Doherty,et al.  Attitude assessment in organizations: Testing three microcomputer-based survey systems. , 1989 .

[18]  N. Mulligan,et al.  Divided attention and indirect memory tests , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[20]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[21]  F. Robert Wilson,et al.  Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology , 1985 .

[22]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[23]  R. Hightower,et al.  The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion , 1995 .

[24]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems , 2000, Ergonomics.

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[27]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[28]  J. Kantor,et al.  The effects of computer administration and identification on the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) , 1991 .