A Holistic Approach to the Integration of Safety Applications: The INSAFES Subproject Within the European Framework Programme 6 Integrating Project PReVENT

This paper deals with the integration of multiple advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) in a holistic driver-support system. The paper presents the results of a project named Integrated Safety Systems (INSAFES), which was part of PReVENT: an integrating project carried out under the European Framework Programme 6. Integration in INSAFES is tackled at three different levels in the framework of a “cognitive car” perspective: 1) at the perception level, to represent the world around the vehicle, including object-tracking between sensor fields and the detection of driver intentions; 2) at the decision level, to reproduce humanlike holistic motion plans, which serve as “reference maneuvers” to evaluate the motion alternatives that a driver faces; and 3) at the level of interaction with the driver and vehicle control ( action level), to arbitrate between the requests of functions competing for driver attention. A function that provides simultaneous longitudinal and lateral support has been developed. It gives support for safe speed, safe distance, lane change, and all-around collision avoidance all at the same time. At its core, there is a tool (evasive/reference maneuver) that constantly evaluates two possible alternatives (in lane and evasive/lane change) and compares them with the driver input to detect which one applies, which dictates warnings and driver interactions, and whether there is a better alternative. In addition, a “warning manager” has been developed, acting like a referee who lets the ADAS applications work standalone and then combines the requests of each application, prioritizes them, and manages the interaction with the user. The warning manager can be particularly useful in the case of integration of pre-existing standalone functions, which can be quickly reused. If a holistic ADAS is developed, the warning manager can still be used to combine it with IVIS functions. In fact, depending on the kind of ADAS and IVIS considered, the most suitable approach can be either to combine functions in a unified multifunctional driver-support application or to arbitrate between them through the warning manager.

[1]  T. Inagaki,et al.  Smart collaboration between humans and machines based on mutual understanding , 2008, Annu. Rev. Control..

[2]  Richard Bishop Intelligent vehicle R&D: A review and contrast of programs worldwide and emerging trends , 2005, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[3]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Junior: The Stanford entry in the Urban Challenge , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[4]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Vision and navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab , 1988 .

[5]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Design and development of an adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface , 2004 .

[6]  Alberto Broggi,et al.  The TerraMax autonomous vehicle: Field Reports , 2006 .

[7]  Alberto Broggi,et al.  The TerraMax autonomous vehicle , 2006, J. Field Robotics.

[8]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned , 2007 .

[9]  J. Hellaker PROMETHEUS - Strategy , 1990, Vehicle Electronics in the 90's: Proceedings of the International Congress on Transportation Electronics.

[10]  H. Aghazarian,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cognition and Consciousness in Intelligent Devices , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[11]  Lars Danielsson,et al.  INSAFES HCI Principles for Integrated ADAS Applications , 2007, HCI.

[12]  Massimo Bertozzi,et al.  VisLab and the Evolution of Vision-Based UGVs , 2006, Computer.

[13]  Dot Hs,et al.  Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned , 2007 .

[14]  Dot Hs Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) , 2008 .

[15]  D. M. Hoedemaeker,et al.  Driver support and information systems : Experiments on learning, appropriation and effects of adaptiveness , 2006 .

[16]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED DRIVER-VEHICLE INTERFACE: OVERVIEW OF THE AIDE PROJECT , 2005 .

[17]  Takahiro Maemura,et al.  Functions and devices of Mitsubishi active safety ASV , 1996, Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Vehicles.

[18]  Mariana Netto,et al.  D16.3 Proposal of procedures for assessment of preventive and active safety functions , 2007 .

[19]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Advanced Driver Assistance Systems from Autonomous to Cooperative Approach , 2008 .

[20]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[21]  Dot Hs Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems , 2011 .

[22]  Nick McKeown,et al.  Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH program , 1991 .

[23]  Kyongsu Yi,et al.  Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm , 2008 .

[24]  Seungwuk Moon,et al.  Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance , 2009 .

[25]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Vision and Navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab , 1987 .

[26]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  PATH at 20—History and Major Milestones , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  N. Floudas,et al.  High Level Sensor Data Fusion Approaches For Object Recognition In Road Environment , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[28]  S E Shladover,et al.  Automated vehicles for highway operations (automated highway systems) , 2005 .

[29]  Paul C. Schutte,et al.  The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction , 2005 .

[30]  Klaus Henning,et al.  The "cognitive car": A roadmap for research issues in the automotive sector , 2006, Annu. Rev. Control..

[31]  Volker Graefe,et al.  Vision-based autonomous road vehicles , 1992 .

[32]  John Dixon,et al.  The Design of Future Things , 2010 .

[33]  J. Christian Gerdes,et al.  A Unified Approach to Driver Assistance Systems Based on Artificial Potential Fields , 1999, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[34]  E. Bertolazzi,et al.  real-time motion planning for multibody systems , 2007 .

[35]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  Prediction of Human Driving Behavior Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2006, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Francesco Biral,et al.  Supporting Drivers in Keeping Safe Speed and Safe Distance: The SASPENCE Subproject Within the European Framework Programme 6 Integrating Project PReVENT , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[37]  Margaret D. Galer Flyte The safe design of in–vehicle information and support systems: the human factors issues , 1995 .