Interpolation Artefacts in Mutual Information-Based Image Registration

Image registration requires the transformation of one image to another so as to spatially align the two images. This involves interpolation to estimate gray values of one of the images at positions other than the grid points. When registering two images that have equal grid distances in one or more dimensions, the grid points can be aligned in those dimensions for certain geometric transformations. Consequently, the number of times interpolation is required to compute the registration measure of two images is dependent on the image transformation. When an entropy-based registration measure, such as mutual information, is plotted as a function of the transformation, it will show sudden changes in value for grid-aligning transformations. Such patterns of local extrema impede the registration optimization process. More importantly, they rule out subvoxel accuracy. In this paper, two frequently applied interpolation methods in mutual information-based image registration are analyzed, viz. linear interpolation and partial volume interpolation. It is shown how the registration function depends on the interpolation method and how a slight resampling of one of the images may drastically improve the smoothness of this function.

[1]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  D L Hill,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. , 1997, Medical physics.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An Extensible MRI Simulator for Post-Processing Evaluation , 1996, VBC.

[4]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[6]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-moda lity image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[14]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[15]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..