Spatial Variability in Soils: High Resolution Assessment with Electrical Needle Probe

The global response of a soil is affected by spatial as well as temporal scales. An electrical needle-size probe is developed to effectively assess one-dimensional spatial variability. The probe is designed for laboratory specimens ~needle diameter 1.2-2.2 mm!, and it can be scaled for field applications. Design considerations include the tip shape, insertion disturbance, electrochemical effects, corro- sion, operating frequency, and electrical resonance. Two calibration methods are presented to determine local soil permittivity and resistivity from the measured complex impedance; the simplified calibration procedure is based on resistance measurements only. The local electrical parameters permit one to infer the soil porosity and the electrolyte conductivity. The attainable spatial resolution depends on the needle diameter; submillimetric resolution is typically achieved in laboratory applications. Reconstituted sand specimens and undisturbed clayey specimens are tested to explore the resolution potential of this probe. The electrical needle probe clearly detects the spatial variability that results from different specimen preparation methods in sands and soil layering from natural formation histories such as those in varved clays.

[1]  George Deodatis,et al.  Influence of Spatial Variability of Soil Properties on Seismically Induced Soil Liquefaction , 1996 .

[2]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Settlements on Spatially Random Soil , 1996 .

[3]  K. Ishihara.  Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[4]  Unsaturated soil stiffness and post-liquefaction shear strength , 2001 .

[5]  Takeji Kokusho,et al.  Formation of Water Film in Liquefied Sand and its Effect on Lateral Spread , 1999 .

[6]  J. Q. Shang,et al.  POLARIZATION AND CONDUCTION OF CLAY-WATER-ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 1995 .

[7]  G. E. Archie.  The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[8]  R. Chambon,et al.  Void ratio evolution inside shear bands in triaxial sand specimens studied by computed tomography , 1996 .

[9]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Discussion: Polarization and Conduction of Clay-Water-Electrolyte Systems , 1996 .

[10]  Vincent B. DeGregorio,et al.  LOADING SYSTEMS, SAMPLE PREPARATION, AND LIQUEFACTION , 1990 .

[11]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Application of risk analysis to the prediction of slope instability , 1977 .

[12]  Richard S. Ladd,et al.  Specimen Preparation and Cyclic Stability of Sands , 1977 .

[13]  R. Dobry,et al.  Pore Pressure Buildup and Liquefaction Failure of Anisotropically Consolidated Sand Due to Cyclic Straining , 1988 .

[14]  Ronald F. Scott,et al.  Quasi-Static Deep Penetration in Clays , 1975 .

[15]  G. Deodatis,et al.  EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY ON SOIL LIQUEFACTION: SOME DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS , 1997 .

[16]  Seiichi Miura,et al.  A SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD AND ITS EFFECT ON STATIC AND CYCLIC DEFORMATION-STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF SAND , 1982 .

[17]  J. K. Mitchell,et al.  THE INFLUENCES OF SAND FABRIC ON LIQUEFACTION BEHAVIOR , 1976 .

[18]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of Sample Preparation on Sand Liquefaction , 1977 .

[19]  J. D. Frost,et al.  PREPARATION OF EPOXY IMPREGNATED SAND COUPONS FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[20]  F. Townsend.  A review of factors affecting cyclic triaxial tests , 1978 .

[21]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  SEEPAGE BENEATH WATER RETAINING STRUCTURES FOUNDED ON SPATIALLY RANDOM SOIL , 1993 .

[22]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Statistics of free surface flow through stochastic earth dam , 1996 .

[23]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Evaluation and Use of Residual Strength in Seismic Safety Analysis of Embankments , 1990 .

[24]  Jong-Sub Lee.  High resolution geophysical techniques for small-scale soil model testing , 2003 .

[25]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Soils and waves:Particulate materials behavior, characterization and process monitoring , 2001 .

[26]  E. I. Parkhomenko.  Electrical properties of rocks , 1967 .

[27]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[28]  Armando Mammino,et al.  Reliability analysis of rock mass response by means of Random Set Theory , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..