Computational analysis of ligand binding dynamics at the intermolecular hot spots with the aid of simulated tempering and binding free energy calculations.

Equilibrium binding dynamics is studied for a panel of benzimidazole-containing compounds at the remodeled interface between human growth hormone (hGH) and the extracellular domain of its receptor (hGHbp), engineered by mutating to glycine hot spot residues T175 from the hormone and W104 from the receptor. Binding energetics is predicted in a good agreement with the experimental data for a panel of these small molecules that complement the engineered defect and restore the binding affinity of the wild-type hGH-hGHbp complex. The results of simulated tempering ligand dynamics at the protein-protein interface reveals a diversity of ligand binding modes that is consistent with the structural orientation of the benzimidazole ring which closely mimics the position of the mutated W104 hot spot residue in the wild-type hGH-hGHbp complex. This structural positioning of the benzimidazole core motif is shown to be a critical feature of the low-energy ligand conformations binding in the engineered cavity. The binding free energy analysis provides a plausible rationale behind the experimental dissociation constants and suggests a key role of ligand-protein van der Waals interactions in restoring binding affinity.

[1]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Structure-based approach for binding site identification on AmpC beta-lactamase. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  J. Wells,et al.  A systematic mutational analysis of hormone-binding determinants in the human growth hormone receptor. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  D. Ringe,et al.  Analysis of the binding surfaces of proteins , 1999, Medicinal research reviews.

[5]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Luxury accommodations: the expanding role of structural plasticity in protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Structure.

[6]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[7]  G. Parisi,et al.  Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme , 1992, hep-lat/9205018.

[8]  T. Clackson,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the 1:1 growth hormone:receptor complex reveals the molecular basis for receptor affinity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Anthony C. Bishop,et al.  Magic bullets for protein kinases. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[10]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Hierarchy of simulation models in predicting structure and energetics of the Src SH2 domain binding to tyrosyl phosphopeptides. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations , 1990 .

[12]  Armin A. Weiser,et al.  Neighbor‐list reduction: Optimization for computation of molecular van der Waals and solvent‐accessible surface areas , 1998 .

[13]  J A McCammon,et al.  Theory of biomolecular recognition. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  A. Davis,et al.  Hydrogen Bonding, Hydrophobic Interactions, and Failure of the Rigid Receptor Hypothesis. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Unraveling principles of lead discovery: from unfrustrated energy landscapes to novel molecular anchors. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Demchenko,et al.  Recognition between flexible protein molecules: induced and assisted folding † , 2001, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[17]  G M Verkhivker,et al.  A mean field model of ligand-protein interactions: implications for the structural assessment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease complexes and receptor-specific binding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Collin M. Stultz,et al.  MCSS functionality maps for a flexible protein , 1999, Proteins.

[19]  U. Hansmann Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules , 1997, physics/9710041.

[20]  P Hobza,et al.  Noncovalent interactions: a challenge for experiment and theory. , 2000, Chemical reviews.

[21]  J. Wells,et al.  Structural and mutational analysis of affinity-inert contact residues at the growth hormone-receptor interface. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[22]  Hansmann,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations in generalized ensemble: Multicanonical algorithm versus simulated tempering. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  D. Ringe,et al.  Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  L Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  GENERALIZED-ENSEMBLE MONTE CARLO METHOD FOR SYSTEMS WITH ROUGH ENERGY LANDSCAPE , 1997, cond-mat/9710306.

[26]  J. Wells,et al.  Comparison of a structural and a functional epitope. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  K. Hukushima,et al.  Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations , 1995, cond-mat/9512035.

[29]  M. Karplus,et al.  Multiple copy simultaneous search and construction of ligands in binding sites: application to inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartic proteinase. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  P. Rejto,et al.  Protein conformational substates from X-ray crystallography. , 1996, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[31]  Paul A. Rejto,et al.  MONTE CARLO STUDY OF LIGAND-PROTEIN BINDING ENERGY LANDSCAPES WITH THE WEIGHTED HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS METHOD , 1999 .

[32]  H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The energy landscape in non-biological and biological molecules , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[33]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Navigating ligand–protein binding free energy landscapes: universality and diversity of protein folding and molecular recognition mechanisms , 2001 .

[34]  David Bawden,et al.  Browsing and Clustering of Chemical Structures , 1988 .

[35]  Djamal Bouzida,et al.  Computational detection of the binding‐site hot spot at the remodeled human growth hormone–receptor interface , 2003, Proteins.

[36]  M. Ultsch,et al.  The X-ray structure of a growth hormone–prolactin receptor complex , 1994, Nature.

[37]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[38]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[39]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[40]  J. Wells,et al.  Structure and function of human growth hormone: implications for the hematopoietins. , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[41]  K. Clauser,et al.  Dimerization of the extracellular domain of the human growth hormone receptor by a single hormone molecule. , 1991, Science.

[42]  P. Willett,et al.  A Comparison of Some Measures for the Determination of Inter‐Molecular Structural Similarity Measures of Inter‐Molecular Structural Similarity , 1986 .

[43]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Milos V. Novotny,et al.  Increased protein backbone conformational entropy upon hydrophobic ligand binding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[45]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Computational alanine scanning of the 1:1 human growth hormone–receptor complex , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces , 2000, Proteins.

[47]  Jörg Weiser,et al.  Fast, approximate algorithm for detection of solvent‐inaccessible atoms , 1999 .

[48]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[49]  Kevan M Shokat,et al.  The emerging power of chemical genetics. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[50]  H Edelsbrunner,et al.  Analytical shape computation of macromolecules: II. Inaccessible cavities in proteins , 1998, Proteins.

[51]  H. Lowman,et al.  Affinity maturation of human growth hormone by monovalent phage display. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  M. Ultsch,et al.  Comparison of the intermediate complexes of human growth hormone bound to the human growth hormone and prolactin receptors , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[53]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  J. Wells,et al.  Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[55]  M. Ultsch,et al.  Crystals of the complex between human growth hormone and the extracellular domain of its receptor. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  S Subramaniam,et al.  Analytical shape computation of macromolecules: I. molecular area and volume through alpha shape , 1998, Proteins.

[57]  M. Ultsch,et al.  Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. , 1992, Science.

[58]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Numerical comparisons of three recently proposed algorithms in the protein folding problem , 1997 .

[59]  W. Delano,et al.  Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. , 2000, Science.

[60]  P A Kollman,et al.  Free energy calculations on dimer stability of the HIV protease using molecular dynamics and a continuum solvent model. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  J A McCammon,et al.  Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[62]  Gennady Verkhivker,et al.  Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[63]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[64]  J A Wells,et al.  Dissecting the energetics of an antibody‐antigen interface by alanine shaving and molecular grafting , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[65]  B K Shoichet,et al.  Structure-based discovery and in-parallel optimization of novel competitive inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[66]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Structure of a phage display-derived variant of human growth hormone complexed to two copies of the extracellular domain of its receptor: evidence for strong structural coupling between receptor binding sites. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  J. Wells,et al.  High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. , 1989, Science.

[68]  Peter J. Alaimo,et al.  Chemical genetic approaches for the elucidation of signaling pathways. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[69]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Redistribution and loss of side chain entropy upon formation of a calmodulin–peptide complex , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[70]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[71]  J A Wells,et al.  Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Computer simulations of ligand–protein binding with ensembles of protein conformations: A Monte Carlo study of HIV‐1 protease binding energy landscapes , 1999 .

[73]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  A Ligand That Is Predicted to Bind Better to Avidin than Biotin: Insights from Computational Fluorine Scanning , 2000 .

[74]  Peter J. Alaimo,et al.  Recent advances in chemical approaches to the study of biological systems. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[75]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[76]  H. Edelsbrunner,et al.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[77]  M. Akke,et al.  May the driving force be with you — whatever it is , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[78]  P. Kollman,et al.  Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[79]  P. Jhurani,et al.  Receptor and antibody epitopes in human growth hormone identified by homolog-scanning mutagenesis. , 1989, Science.

[80]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Hierarchy of simulation models in predicting molecular recognition mechanisms from the binding energy landscapes: Structural analysis of the peptide complexes with SH2 domains , 2001, Proteins.

[81]  Anthony C. Bishop,et al.  Unnatural ligands for engineered proteins: new tools for chemical genetics. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[82]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Towards understanding the mechanisms of molecular recognition by computer simulations of ligand–protein interactions , 1999, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[83]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Protein functional epitopes: hot spots, dynamics and combinatorial libraries. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[84]  Djamal Bouzida,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of the peptide recognition at the consensus binding site of the constant fragment of human immunoglobulin G: The energy landscape analysis of a hot spot at the intermolecular interface , 2002, Proteins.

[85]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[86]  G. Chang,et al.  Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanics , 1990 .

[87]  P. Willett,et al.  Implementation of nonhierarchic cluster analysis methods in chemical information structure search , 1986 .

[88]  Kumar,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo methods for the computer simulation of biological molecules. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[89]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Exploring the energy landscapes of molecular recognition by a genetic algorithm: analysis of the requirements for robust docking of HIV-1 protease and FKBP-12 complexes. , 1996, Proteins.

[90]  Julie D. Forman-Kay,et al.  The 'dynamics' in the thermodynamics of binding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[91]  P G Schultz,et al.  Designing small-molecule switches for protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Science.

[92]  M R Lee,et al.  Use of MM‐PB/SA in estimating the free energies of proteins: Application to native, intermediates, and unfolded villin headpiece , 2000, Proteins.

[93]  S. Atwell,et al.  Structural plasticity in a remodeled protein-protein interface. , 1997, Science.

[94]  M Karplus,et al.  Use of MCSS to design small targeted libraries: application to picornavirus ligands. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[95]  W. C. Still,et al.  Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO) , 1999 .

[96]  P. Dean,et al.  Recent advances in structure-based rational drug design. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[97]  James M. Hogle,et al.  Functional group placement in protein binding sites: a comparison of GRID and MCSS , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[98]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[100]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  M. V. Regenmortel,et al.  Molecular recognition in the post-reductionist era. , 1999 .

[102]  D. Case,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids with a Generalized Born Solvation Model , 2000 .