Oncotargets and Therapy Dovepress Clinical Impacts of a Micropapillary Pattern in Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Review

hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms Abstract: Lung adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary pattern (MPPAC) has recently drawn increased attention among researchers. Micropapillary-predominant adenocarcinoma (MPA), which is defined by micropapillary pattern (MPP), is the primary histological pattern observed semiquantitatively in 5% increments on resection specimens, and MPA was formally determined to be a new histological subtype according to the new multidisciplinary classification in 2011. According to published studies, MPPAC is most common in males and nonsmokers and is associated with lymphatic invasion, pleural invasion, and lymph node metastases. MPPAC often presents as part-solid and lobulated nodules in computed tomography scans. MPP tends to have a higher maximum standardized uptake value as determined by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography, indicating a high risk of recurrence. Molecular markers, including vimentin, napsin A, phosphorylated c-Met, cytoplas-mic maspin, Notch-1, MUC1, and tumoral CD10, may have higher expression in MPPAC than other subtypes; conversely, markers such as MUC4 and surfactant apoprotein A have lower expression in MPPAC. MPPAC with EGFR mutations can benefit from treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Furthermore, a complete lobectomy may be more suitable than limited resection for MPPAC because of the low sensitivity of intraoperative frozen sections and the high risk of lymph node metastasis. MPA benefits more from adjuvant chemotherapy than do other histological subtypes, whereas MPA does not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Of note, MPP is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, but the prognostic value of MPP is controversial in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

[1]  J. Choi,et al.  Role of CT and PET Imaging in Predicting Tumor Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  C. Zhan,et al.  Lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA peripheral lung cancer. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[3]  David R. Jones,et al.  Tumoral CD10 expression correlates with high-grade histology and increases risk of recurrence in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[4]  G. Rossi,et al.  Classification of different patterns of pulmonary adenocarcinomas , 2015, Expert review of respiratory medicine.

[5]  Andrew D Althouse,et al.  Accuracy of the IASLC/ATS/ERS histological subtyping of stage I lung adenocarcinoma on intraoperative frozen sections , 2015, Modern Pathology.

[6]  M. Okada,et al.  Radiologic findings to predict low-grade malignant tumour among clinical T1bN0 lung adenocarcinomas: lessons from histological subtypes. , 2015, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  C. Sima,et al.  Using frozen section to identify histological patterns in stage I lung adenocarcinoma of ≤3 cm: accuracy and interobserver agreement , 2015, Histopathology.

[8]  L. Carvalho,et al.  Lung adenocarcinoma: Sustained subtyping with immunohistochemistry and EGFR, HER2 and KRAS mutational status. , 2015, Revista portuguesa de pneumologia.

[9]  David R. Jones,et al.  Tumor Spread through Air Spaces is an Important Pattern of Invasion and Impacts the Frequency and Location of Recurrences after Limited Resection for Small Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Clinical Impact of Minimal Micropapillary Pattern in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma: Prognostic Significance and Survival Outcomes , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  Gwénaël Le Teuff,et al.  Subtype Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Predicts Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Resection. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  R. Machii,et al.  Morphological distribution of lung cancer from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. X. , 2015, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  M. Saegusa,et al.  Prevalent and up‐regulated vimentin expression in micropapillary components of lung adenocarcinomas and its adverse prognostic significance , 2015, Pathology international.

[14]  Kunio Araki,et al.  Cytoplasmic maspin expression is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma measuring <3 cm , 2015, Histopathology.

[15]  Helena Carreira,et al.  Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) , 2015, The Lancet.

[16]  Shaohua Lu,et al.  Solid component and tumor size correlate with prognosis of stage IB lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  Yang Zhang,et al.  A Comprehensive Investigation of Molecular Features and Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Micropapillary Component , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[18]  Jian Hu,et al.  Predictive risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with small size non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[19]  L. Chao,et al.  Relevance of EGFR mutation with micropapillary pattern according to the novel IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification and correlation with prognosis in Chinese patients. , 2014, Lung cancer.

[20]  Yang Zhang,et al.  A clinicopathologic prediction model for postoperative recurrence in stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  David R. Jones,et al.  Implementing the new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinomas: results from international and Chinese cohorts. , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[22]  K. Sun,et al.  Risk factors of recurrence for resected T1aN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 177 patients , 2014, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[23]  V. Barresi,et al.  Micropapillary pattern and poorly differentiated clusters represent the same biological phenomenon in colorectal cancer: a proposal for a change in terminology. , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  David R. Jones,et al.  The new IASLC-ATS-ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification: what the surgeon should know. , 2014, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  David R. Jones,et al.  Recent advances and clinical implications of the micropapillary histological subtype in lung adenocarcinomas. , 2014, Lung cancer management.

[26]  S. Giunta,et al.  Mucin 1 (MUC1) signalling contributes to increase the resistance to cell death in human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to nickel acetate , 2014, BioMetals.

[27]  Wang Li,et al.  Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  H. Maeda,et al.  Lymphatic invasion of micropapillary cancer cells is associated with a poor prognosis of pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinomas , 2014, Oncology letters.

[29]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Correlation of survival and EGFR mutation with predominant histologic subtype according to the new lung adenocarcinoma classification in stage IB patients , 2014, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  P. Russell,et al.  The Clinical Relevance of Pathologic Subtypes in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[31]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Characterization of the genomic features and expressed fusion genes in micropapillary carcinomas of the breast , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[32]  A. Campos-Parra,et al.  Relevance of the novel IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma in advanced disease , 2014, European Respiratory Journal.

[33]  K. Nabeshima,et al.  Association of c-Met phosphorylation with micropapillary pattern and small cluster invasion in pT1-size lung adenocarcinoma. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[34]  S. Monaco,et al.  Cytologic subtyping of lung adenocarcinoma by using the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) adenocarcinoma classification , 2013, Cancer Cytopathology.

[35]  Long-Bang Chen,et al.  Expression of Notch-1 and its clinical significance in different histological subtypes of human lung adenocarcinoma , 2013, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[36]  H. Asamura,et al.  The utility of the proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma subtypes for disease prognosis and correlation of driver gene alterations. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[37]  Q. Tan,et al.  Why Do Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinomas Vary from Prognosis?: A Clinicopathologic Study of 176 Patients with Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[38]  A. Warth,et al.  EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas: patient outcome, interplay with morphology and immunophenotype , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[39]  K. Ridge,et al.  The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in the progression of lung cancer. , 2013, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[40]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  Impact of micropapillary histologic subtype in selecting limited resection vs lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma of 2cm or smaller. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  H. Pass Lung cancer, histologic stratification, and resection extent: something for surgeons to think about. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  F. Shepherd,et al.  Adjuvant chemotherapy after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. , 2013, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[43]  H. Lee,et al.  Colorectal micropapillary carcinomas are associated with poor prognosis and enriched in markers of stem cells , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[44]  Wei Wu,et al.  Correlation of EGFR mutation and predominant histologic subtype according to the new lung adenocarcinoma classification in Chinese patients , 2013, Medical Oncology.

[45]  A. Chang,et al.  Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. , 2013, Chest.

[46]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma in resected specimens: implications of the 2011 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[47]  V. Reuter,et al.  Clinical outcome of patients with T1 micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[48]  P. Russell,et al.  Correlation of Mutation Status and Survival with Predominant Histologic Subtype According to the New IASLC/ATS/ERS Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification in Stage III (N2) Patients , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[49]  Lynette M. Smith,et al.  Pathobiological Implications of MUC4 in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[50]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  KRAS mutations are associated with solid growth pattern and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes in lung adenocarcinoma , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[51]  W. Travis,et al.  New pathologic classification of lung cancer: relevance for clinical practice and clinical trials. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  L. Landi,et al.  Targeting c-MET in the battle against advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer , 2013, Current opinion in oncology.

[53]  A. Yoshizawa,et al.  Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification for Prognosis and Association with EGFR and KRAS Gene Mutations: Analysis of 440 Japanese Patients , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[54]  K. Nabeshima,et al.  Invasion of the inner and outer layers of the visceral pleura in pT1 size lung adenocarcinoma measuring ≤3 cm: correlation with malignant aggressiveness and prognosis , 2012, Virchows Archiv.

[55]  Hyo Jin Kim,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodular lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of histopathologic scoring and patient survival with imaging biomarkers. , 2012, Radiology.

[56]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Correlation of radio- and histomorphological pattern of pulmonary adenocarcinoma , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[57]  T. Chou,et al.  Stromal invasion and micropapillary pattern in 212 consecutive surgically resected stage I lung adenocarcinomas: histopathological categories for prognosis prediction , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[58]  C. Sima,et al.  FDG-PET SUVmax Combined with IASLC/ATS/ERS Histologic Classification Improves the Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[59]  P. Cagle,et al.  Napsin A, a new marker for lung adenocarcinoma, is complementary and more sensitive and specific than thyroid transcription factor 1 in the differential diagnosis of primary pulmonary carcinoma: evaluation of 1674 cases by tissue microarray. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[60]  Y. Miyagi,et al.  Stromal micropapillary component as a novel unfavorable prognostic factor of lung adenocarcinoma , 2012, Diagnostic Pathology.

[61]  Yong-Man Kim,et al.  Micropapillary pattern in serous borderline ovarian tumors: does it matter? , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[62]  H. Shim,et al.  Histopathologic characteristics of lung adenocarcinomas with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society lung adenocarcinoma classification. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[63]  Antonio Marchetti,et al.  Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring BRAF mutations. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[64]  A. Yılmaz,et al.  Prognostic significance of micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma and expression of apoptosis‐related markers: caspase‐3, bcl‐2, and p53 , 2011, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[65]  S. Swanson,et al.  Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer<=1 cm in size: a review of SEER data. , 2011, Chest.

[66]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  A Grading System of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on Histologic Pattern is Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Tumors , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[67]  E. Halm,et al.  Limited Resection for the Treatment of Patients With Stage IA Lung Cancer , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[68]  A. Moreira,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pattern: Does it correlate with the histologic findings? , 2009, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[69]  H. Ren,et al.  [Detecting MUC-1 mRNA for diagnosing peripheral blood micro-metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients]. , 2008, Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer.

[70]  H. Horinouchi,et al.  Histopathological features and prognostic significance of the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[71]  N. Moreno,et al.  Micropapillary lung adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologic subtype with prognostic significance. Case series. , 2008, Human pathology.

[72]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Mucinous differentiation correlates with absence of EGFR mutation and presence of KRAS mutation in lung adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar features. , 2007, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[73]  M. Hollingsworth,et al.  A micropapillary pattern is predictive of a poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, and reduced surfactant apoprotein A expression in the micropapillary pattern is an excellent indicator of a poor prognosis , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[74]  D. Zander,et al.  MUC4 expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas: relationship to tumor histology and patient survival. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[75]  K. Burman Micropapillary thyroid cancer: should we aspirate all nodules regardless of size? , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[76]  S. Johansson,et al.  Micropapillary carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[77]  H. Iwasaki,et al.  Micropapillary pattern: a distinct pathological marker to subclassify tumours with a significantly poor prognosis within small peripheral lung adenocarcinoma (≤20 mm) with mixed bronchioloalveolar and invasive subtypes (Noguchi's type C tumours) , 2005, Histopathology.

[78]  M. Roh,et al.  Relationship between micropapillary component and micrometastasis in the regional lymph nodes of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma , 2004, Histopathology.

[79]  S. Gendler,et al.  MUC1 overexpression results in mammary gland tumorigenesis and prolonged alveolar differentiation , 2004, Oncogene.

[80]  D. Visscher,et al.  Invasive Micropapillary Salivary Duct Carcinoma: A Distinct Histologic Variant With Biologic Significance , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[81]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinomas With a Micropapillary Pattern, a Distinct Pathologic Marker for a Significantly Poor Prognosis , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[82]  Roman Kodet,et al.  Value of thyroid transcription factor-1 and surfactant apoprotein A in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary carcinomas: a study of 109 cases , 2002, Virchows Archiv.

[83]  Jungsil Ro,et al.  Micropapillary Component in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Distinctive Histologic Feature With Possible Prognostic Significance , 2002, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[84]  L V Rubinstein,et al.  Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[85]  Tom Starzl,et al.  THE LANCET , 1992, The Lancet.

[86]  M. Okada,et al.  Negative prognostic influence of micropapillary pattern in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[87]  H. Saji,et al.  Close association of IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma subtypes with glucose-uptake in positron emission tomography. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[88]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Frequency of well-identified oncogenic driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma of smokers varies with histological subtypes and graduated smoking dose. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[89]  Denise R. Aberle,et al.  Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. , 2013, Radiology.

[90]  A. Tsao Occult metastases in lymph nodes predict survival in resectable non–small-cell lung cancer: report of the ACOSOG Z0040 trial , 2012 .

[91]  F. Askin,et al.  True papillary carcinoma of the lung: a distinct clinicopathologic entity. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[92]  P. Marsden,et al.  Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in preoperative evaluation of lung cancer. , 1994, Lancet.

[93]  P M Steinert,et al.  Molecular and cellular biology of intermediate filaments. , 1988, Annual review of biochemistry.

[94]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 2022 .