Comparison of reconstruction algorithms for sparse-array detection photoacoustic tomography

A photoacoustic tomography (PAT) imaging system based on a sparse 2D array of detector elements and an iterative image reconstruction algorithm has been proposed, which opens the possibility for high frame-rate 3D PAT. The efficacy of this PAT implementation is highly influenced by the choice of the reconstruction algorithm. In recent years, a variety of new reconstruction algorithms have been proposed for medical image reconstruction that have been motivated by the emerging theory of compressed sensing. These algorithms have the potential to accurately reconstruct sparse objects from highly incomplete measurement data, and therefore may be highly suited for sparse array PAT. In this context, a sparse object is one that is described by a relatively small number of voxel elements, such as typically arises in blood vessel imaging. In this work, we investigate the use of a gradient projection-based iterative reconstruction algorithm for image reconstruction in sparse-array PAT. The algorithm seeks to minimize an 1-norm penalized least-squares cost function. By use of computer-simulation studies, we demonstrate that the gradient projection algorithm may further improve the efficacy of sparse-array PAT.

[1]  Xu Xiao Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2008 .

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  D. Schaefer,et al.  Microwave power absorption differences between normal and malignant tissue. , 1980, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  S. Jacques,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for optoacoustic imaging. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[6]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[9]  Rakesh,et al.  Determining a Function from Its Mean Values Over a Family of Spheres , 2004, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[10]  A. Welch,et al.  A review of the optical properties of biological tissues , 1990 .

[11]  R. Kruger,et al.  Photoacoustic ultrasound (PAUS)--reconstruction tomography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[12]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Data redundancy and reduced-scan reconstruction in reflectivity tomography , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Half-time image reconstruction in thermoacoustic tomography , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  A. Tam Applications of photoacoustic sensing techniques , 1986 .

[15]  Pinhas Ephrat,et al.  Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging by sparse-array detection and iterative image reconstruction. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography. , 2005 .

[17]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Feasibility of half-data image reconstruction in 3-D reflectivity tomography with a spherical aperture , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Frédéric Lesage,et al.  The Application of Compressed Sensing for Photo-Acoustic Tomography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.