Direct optimization approach for lithographic process conditions

We present a semiautomatic procedure for the optimization of lithographic process conditions. In the regime of resolution enhancement techniques such as optical proximity correction, off-axis illumination, and phase shifting masks, the design of lithographic photomasks and illumination sources becomes increasingly intricate. Earlier "what you see is what you get" (WYSIWYG) approaches cannot be applied anymore. Instead, the employment of sophisticated design optimization tools is inevitable. In contrast to related efforts using an inverse problem formulation to address this goal, the approach presented here can be considered a direct method: mask and illumination layouts are mutually altered, evaluated, and improved, using an heuristic search algorithm. Thus, not only does this method require very little a priori knowledge of the process, it also allows for a very flexible problem formulation, enabling an easy integration of different model options or even process steps. As an underlying optimization algorithm of the presented procedure, a genetic algorithm has been used, whose flow, data representation, and basic operations are discussed briefly. Different representation types for both mask and illumination setups and the formulation of the optimization objectives are explained in detail. Various well-performing mask and illumination settings demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach and point out further potentials: in contrast to single problem specific approaches, this method is applicable to a great variety of different complex optimization tasks in advanced lithography.

[1]  Yong-Ho Oh,et al.  Resolution enhancement through optical proximity correction and stepper parameter optimization for 0.12-μm mask pattern , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.  Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape , 2002 .

[3]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[4]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[5]  Bruce W. Smith Mutual optimization of resolution enhancement techniques , 2002 .

[6]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[7]  Bernd Tollkuhn,et al.  Will Darwin's law help us to improve our resist models? , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Yuri Granik,et al.  Solving inverse problems of optical microlithography , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Kafai Lai,et al.  Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[11]  Gabriella Kókai,et al.  Genetic Algorithms to Improve Mask and Illumination Geometries in Lithographic Imaging Systems , 2004, EvoWorkshops.

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  Stephen Hsu,et al.  Model-based scattering bars implementation for 65nm and 45nm nodes using IML technology , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[14]  Alfred Kwok-Kit Wong,et al.  Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography , 2001 .

[15]  Lars W. Liebmann,et al.  Lithographic comparison of assist feature design strategies , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[17]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  OPC and PSM design using inverse lithography: a nonlinear optimization approach , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Yorick Trouiller,et al.  ArF imaging with off-axis illumination and subresolution assist bars: a compromise between mask constraints and lithographic process constraints , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Stephen D. Hsu,et al.  Contact hole reticle optimization by using interference mapping lithography (IML) , 2004, Photomask Japan.

[20]  Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.  Global optimization of the illumination distribution to maximize integrated process window , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Andreas Erdmann,et al.  Mask and source optimization for lithographic imaging systems , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[22]  Christian Jacob,et al.  6 – Evolutionary Programming , 2001 .

[23]  Andreas Erdmann,et al.  The impact of the mask stack and its optical parameters on the imaging performance , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Christian Jacob,et al.  Illustrating Evolutionary Computation with Mathematica , 2001 .