Influence of Vocalic Context on Perception of the [j [s] Distinction: Ii. Spectral Factors

When synthetic fricative noises from a [∫]-[s] continuum are followed by [a] or [u] (with appropriate formant transitions), listeners perceive more instances of [s] in the context of [u] than in the context of [a]. Presumably, this reflects a perceptual adjustment for the coarticulatory effect of rounded vowels on preceding fricatives. In Experiment 1, we found that varying the duration of the fricative noise leaves the perceptual context effect unchanged, whereas insertion of a silent interval following the noise reduces the effect substantially. Experiment 2 suggested that it is temporal separation rather than the perception of an intervening stop consonant that is responsible for this reduction, in agreement with recent, analogous observations on anticipatory coarticulation. In Experiment 3, we showed that the vowel context effect disappears when the periodic stimulus portion is synthesized so as to contain no formant transitions. To dissociate the contribution of formant transitions from contextual effects due to vowel quality per se, Experiment 4 employed synthetic fricative noises followed by periodic portions excerpted from naturally produced [∫a], [sa], [∫u], and [su]. The results showed strong and largely independent effects of formant transitions and vowel quality on fricative perception. In addition, we found a strong speaker (male vs. female) normalization effect. All three influences on fricative perception were reduced by temporal separation of noise and periodic stimulus portions. Although no single hypothesis can explain all of our results, they are generally supportive of the view that some knowledge of the dynamics of speech production has a role in speech perception.

[1]  H. Fujisaki,et al.  Analysis, recognition, and perception of voiceless fricative consonants in Japanese , 1978 .

[2]  M. F. Schwartz,et al.  Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Christopher J. Darwin,et al.  Pitch continuity and speech source attribution , 1977 .

[4]  H. Winitz,et al.  The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Ilse Lehiste,et al.  Vowel Amplitude and Phonemic Stress in American English , 1959 .

[6]  D. Whalen Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. V. Bondarko The Syllable Structure of Speech and Distinctive Features of Phonemes , 1969 .

[8]  Arthur S. House,et al.  An Experimental Study of Vowel Intensities , 1950 .

[9]  K. Stevens,et al.  On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants , 1961 .

[10]  R. Cole,et al.  Perception of temporal order in speech: the role of vowel transitions. , 1973, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  K. Harris,et al.  Anticipatory coarticulation: some implications from a study of lip rounding. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Effects of vowel context upon labelling the /s/‐/š/ continuum , 1976 .

[13]  A. Liberman,et al.  Identification and Discrimination of a Phonemic Contrast Induced by Silent Interval , 1961 .

[14]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Ades Source Assignment and Feature Extraction in Speech. , 1977 .

[16]  D. Klatt,et al.  The duration of (s) in English words. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  K. Harris Cues for the Discrimination of American English Fricatives in Spoken Syllables , 1958 .

[19]  B. Repp Perceptual integration and differentiation of spectral cues for intervocalic stop consonants , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  H. Fujisaka,et al.  Analysis, recognition and perception of voiceless fricative consonants in Japanese , 1976, ICASSP.

[21]  B H Repp,et al.  Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[23]  F. Cooper,et al.  FORMANT TRANSITIONS AND LOCI AS ACOUSTIC CORRELATES OF PLACE OF ARTICULATION IN AMERICAN FRICATIVES , 1962 .

[24]  N. Umeda Consonant duration in American English , 1977 .

[25]  Victor W. Zue,et al.  Acoustic Characteristics of Stop Consonants: A Controlled Study , 1976 .

[26]  K. Harris,et al.  Anticipatory coarticulation: Some implications from a study of lip rounding , 1977 .

[27]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .