Investigating the Influence of Architecture and Material Composition of 3D Printed Anatomical Design Scaffolds for Large Bone Defects

There is a significant unmet clinical need to prevent amputations due to large bone loss injuries. We are addressing this problem by developing a novel, cost-effective osseointegrated prosthetic solution based on the use of modular pieces, bone bricks, made with biocompatible and biodegradable materials that fit together in a Lego-like way to form the prosthesis. This paper investigates the anatomical designed bone bricks with different architectures, pore size gradients, and material compositions. Polymer and polymer-composite 3D printed bone bricks are extensively morphological, mechanical, and biological characterized. Composite bone bricks were produced by mixing polycaprolactone (PCL) with different levels of hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tri-calcium phosphate (TCP). Results allowed to establish a correlation between bone bricks architecture and material composition and bone bricks performance. Reinforced bone bricks showed improved mechanical and biological results. Best mechanical properties were obtained with PCL/TCP bone bricks with 38 double zig-zag filaments and 14 spiral-like pattern filaments, while the best biological results were obtained with PCL/HA bone bricks based on 25 double zig-zag filaments and 14 spiral-like pattern filaments.

[1]  Wei Long Ng,et al.  Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet , 2019, Progress in Polymer Science.

[2]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Biofabrication Techniques for Ceramics and Composite Bone Scaffolds , 2019, Bioceramics and Biocomposites.

[3]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Resolution and shape in bioprinting: Strategizing towards complex tissue and organ printing , 2019, Applied Physics Reviews.

[4]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Polymer-Ceramic Composite Scaffolds: The Effect of Hydroxyapatite and β-tri-Calcium Phosphate , 2018, Materials.

[5]  J. Pawitan,et al.  Modified Masquelet technique using allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for infected non-union femoral shaft fracture with a 12 cm bone defect: A case report , 2017, International journal of surgery case reports.

[6]  G. Schmidmaier,et al.  Treatment of atrophic femoral non-unions according to the diamond concept: Results of one- and two-step surgical procedure. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedics.

[7]  Richard O.C. Oreffo,et al.  Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[8]  Benjamin C. Taylor,et al.  Treatment of Bone Loss With the Induced Membrane Technique: Techniques and Outcomes , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  S. Flohe,et al.  Reconstruction of septic diaphyseal bone defects with the induced membrane technique. , 2015, Injury.

[10]  G. Calori,et al.  Megaprosthesis in post-traumatic and periprosthetic large bone defects: Issues to consider. , 2014, Injury.

[11]  Nicola Maffulli,et al.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[12]  G. Calori,et al.  Megaprosthesis in large bone defects: opportunity or chimaera? , 2014, Injury.

[13]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of long bone defects of the lower limbs: effectiveness, complications and clinical results; a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[14]  B. French,et al.  Induced Membrane Technique for Reconstruction To Manage Bone Loss , 2012, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[15]  H. Fischer,et al.  Scaffolds for bone healing: concepts, materials and evidence. , 2011, Injury.

[16]  K. Malizos,et al.  Vascularized fibula transfer for lower limb reconstruction , 2011, Microsurgery.

[17]  Raju Vaishya,et al.  Treatment of resistant nonunion of supracondylar fractures femur by megaprosthesis , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: Present and future trends , 2009 .

[19]  R. Borra,et al.  A simple method to measure cell viability in proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 2009, Brazilian oral research.

[20]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Fracture healing: the diamond concept. , 2007, Injury.

[21]  Colleen L Flanagan,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[22]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal Femoral Replacements With Megaprostheses , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  M. Pirela-Cruz,et al.  Management of Posttraumatic Segmental Bone Defects , 2004, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[24]  K. An,et al.  Mechanical properties of a biodegradable bone regeneration scaffold. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  L. Kuhn,et al.  Design and characterization of calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  O. Ashman,et al.  Treatment of non-unions with bone defects: which option and why? , 2013, Injury.

[27]  J. Ciurana,et al.  Biomedical production of implants by additive electro-chemical and physical processes , 2012 .

[28]  Michael K Pugsley,et al.  An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells. , 2011, Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society.

[29]  H. Pape,et al.  Bone defects caused by high-energy injuries, bone loss, infected nonunions, and nonunions. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[30]  A. Masquelet,et al.  The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[31]  J M Powers,et al.  Fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds to engineer trabecular bone. , 1995, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[32]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.