A Brief Review: Speckle Filtering Methods

Due to non-invasive nature, low cost, capability of real time imaging formation and the on-going improvements in image quality of Ultrasound (US), it is a widely used and safe medical diagnostic technique. Irrespective of these features of US imagery, its main disadvantage is the presence of noise due to backscattered echo signals called speckle. Therefore, it is not only difficult for the physician to analyze and diagnose the image in the presence of speckle noise but feature extraction, and further analysis is also difficult. There are numerous techniques found in the literature to reduce the speckle noise in US images, it is hard to find out the best techniques among them and to get the drawbacks of existed methods with a comparison to each other. Generally there are two types of techniques (spatial and frequency domain techniques) depending upon the domain used while calculating the modified pixels for speckle reduction. In this paper, performance of various spatial and frequency domain speckle reduction techniques is compared  using quality metrics (EPF, SSIM, SNR, and RMSE) and it is concluded that SRAD filter outperforms all other speckle reduction filters

[1]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[2]  D. Sakrison,et al.  On the Role of the Observer and a Distortion Measure in Image Transmission , 1977, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[3]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  S. Deans The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , 1983 .

[5]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Shun Wang,et al.  Ionograms denoising via curvelet transform , 2013 .

[7]  Lili Wu,et al.  Speckle filtering of medical ultrasonic images using wavelet and guided filter. , 2016, Ultrasonics.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[9]  Göran Salomonsson,et al.  Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Minh N. Do,et al.  The finite ridgelet transform for image representation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  E. Candès,et al.  Ridgelets: a key to higher-dimensional intermittency? , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Lucia Dettori,et al.  A comparison of wavelet, ridgelet, and curvelet-based texture classification algorithms in computed tomography , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..