A measurement-based study on the use of spatial interpolation for propagation estimation

In this paper, we provide a first comprehensive comparison on the performance of two spatial estimation approaches used for propagation estimation. The first estimates the shadowing distribution with considerably low number of measurements and the second estimates the received power with no information of the transmitter location. We discuss in details the relative advantages of these techniques and study particularly their performance when using different number of measurement points. Our study is based on data from a very carefully conducted large-scale measurement campaign with a high spatial density. The robustness of our results is verified in different propagation environments and different frequencies. In particular, we show that for very small number of samples, prediction based on shadowing results in better performance. However, with small increase in the number of available measurements, this more complex approach becomes unnecessary and direct prediction of the received power yields very good results.

[1]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[2]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd Edition) by , 2012 .

[3]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[4]  W.C.Y. Lee,et al.  Estimate of local average power of a mobile radio signal , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[6]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Impact of the path loss model on the spatial structure of shadow fading , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Measurements of Shadow Correlations in a Suburban Environment on the 485 MHz Band , 2013, 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[8]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  Practical radio environment mapping with geostatistics , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[9]  B. Sayrac,et al.  Interference Cartography for Hierarchical Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[10]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Characterization and modelling of spectrum for dynamic spectrum access with spatial statistics and random fields , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.