Opportunities for community awareness platforms in personal genomics and bioinformatics education

Precision and personalized medicine will be increasingly based on the integration of various type of information, particularly electronic health records and genome sequences. The availability of cheap genome sequencing services and the information interoperability will increase the role of online bioinformatics analysis. Being on the Internet poses constant threats to security and privacy. While we are connected and we share information, websites and internet services collect various types of personal data with or without the user consent. It is likely that genomics will merge with the internet culture of connectivity. This process will increase incidental findings, exposure and vulnerability. Here we discuss the social vulnerability owing to the genome and Internet combined security and privacy weaknesses. This urges more efforts in education and social awareness on how biomedical data are analysed and transferred through the internet and how inferential methods could integrate information from different sources. We propose that digital social platforms, used for raising collective awareness in different fields, could be developed for collaborative and bottom-up efforts in education. In this context, bioinformaticians could play a meaningful role in mitigating the future risk of digital-genomic divide.

[1]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment , 1988, American journal of community psychology.

[2]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  XML, bioinformatics and data integration , 2001, Bioinform..

[3]  P. Farrand,et al.  The efficacy of the `mind map' study technique , 2002, Medical education.

[4]  Don Gilbert,et al.  Bioinformatics software resources. , 2004, Briefings in bioinformatics.

[5]  R. Chambers,et al.  Vulnerability, Coping and Policy (Editorial Introduction) , 2006 .

[6]  Aleksandar Milenkovic,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for personal health monitoring: Issues and an implementation , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[7]  Douglas Crockford,et al.  The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) , 2006, RFC.

[8]  Jane Calvert,et al.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology , 2009, EMBO reports.

[9]  Tin Wee Tan,et al.  The implementation of e-learning tools to enhance undergraduate bioinformatics teaching and learning: a case study in the National University of Singapore , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  W. Bonney Is it appropriate, or ethical, to use health data collected for the purpose of direct patient care to develop computerized predictive decision support tools? , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  Thomas Schabetsberger,et al.  Relevance and Management of Methylation Data in Electronic Health Records , 2009, MIE.

[12]  A. McGuire,et al.  Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. , 2010, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[13]  Alex Bateman,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game , 2010, Nature.

[15]  Peter J. Hunter,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Databases and Ontologies the Physiome Model Repository 2 , 2022 .

[16]  Fran Lewitter,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Teaching Bioinformatics at the High School Level , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Getting Help from Online Scientific Communities , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Alissa Cooper,et al.  Net Neutrality Discourses: Comparing Advocacy and Regulatory Arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[19]  Brent S. Pedersen,et al.  BioStar: An Online Question & Answer Resource for the Bioinformatics Community , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Alison Powell,et al.  Net Neutrality Discourses: Comparing Advocacy and Regulatory Arguments in the US and the UK , 2011 .

[21]  Jo Pierson,et al.  Online Privacy in Social Media: A Conceptual Exploration of Empowerment and Vulnerability , 2012 .

[22]  Bruce Wightman,et al.  Integration of bioinformatics into an undergraduate biology curriculum and the impact on development of mathematical skills , 2012, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[23]  Ralf De Wolf,et al.  Evaluating social media privacy settings for personal and advertising purposes , 2014 .

[24]  Towards quantitative measures in applied ontology , 2012, ArXiv.

[25]  Fabrizio Sestini Collective Awareness Platforms: Engines for Sustainability and Ethics , 2012, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[26]  Robert Schmieder,et al.  SEQanswers: an open access community for collaboratively decoding genomes , 2012, Bioinform..

[27]  Gang Feng,et al.  Disease Ontology: a backbone for disease semantic integration , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Feng Xia,et al.  A Secured Health Care Application Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems , 2011, ArXiv.

[29]  Dan M. Bolser,et al.  The NGS WikiBook: a dynamic collaborative online training effort with long-term sustainability , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[30]  Hasso Plattner,et al.  High-Performance In-Memory Genome Data Analysis: How In-Memory Database Technology Accelerates Personalized Medicine , 2013 .

[31]  Anat Yarden,et al.  Integrating bioinformatics into senior high school: design principles and implications , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[32]  Benjamin M. Good,et al.  Dizeez: An Online Game for Human Gene-Disease Annotation , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  J. Dijck The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[34]  Peter C Farley,et al.  Using the Computer Game “FoldIt” to Entice Students to Explore External Representations of Protein Structure in a Biochemistry Course for Nonmajors , 2013, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[35]  Michel Dumontier,et al.  Towards quantitative measures in applied ontology , 2012, ArXiv.

[36]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  Integration of Genomics into the Electronic Health Record: Mapping Terra Incognita , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[37]  Esma Aïmeur Online Privacy: Risks, Challenges, and New Trends , 2014, CRiSIS.

[38]  Damian Smedley,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Benjamin M. Good,et al.  The Cure: Design and Evaluation of a Crowdsourcing Game for Gene Selection for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction , 2014, JMIR serious games.

[40]  Adam Liwo,et al.  WeFold: A coopetition for protein structure prediction , 2014, Proteins.

[41]  B. Knoppers,et al.  The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations , 2014, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[42]  Kari Clase,et al.  A Survey of Scholarly Literature Describing the Field of Bioinformatics Education and Bioinformatics Educational Research , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[43]  Peter Tarczy-Hornoch,et al.  Pragmatic and Ethical Challenges of Incorporating the Genome into the Electronic Health Record , 2014, Current Genetic Medicine Reports.

[44]  Peter Tarczy-Hornoch,et al.  Pragmatic and Ethical Challenges of Incorporating the Genome into the Electronic Medical Record. , 2014, Current genetic medicine reports.

[45]  K. Spector-Bagdady,et al.  Reconceptualizing Consent for Direct-to-Consumer Health Services , 2015, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[46]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  Digital Games for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Underpinning Theory With Three Illustrative Examples , 2015, JMIR serious games.

[47]  Sanguthevar Rajasekaran,et al.  ERGC: an efficient referential genome compression algorithm , 2015, Bioinform..

[48]  R. Charo,et al.  The societal opportunities and challenges of genome editing , 2015, Genome Biology.

[49]  J. Berg,et al.  Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice , 2015, Current Genetic Medicine Reports.

[50]  Sarah M. Keating,et al.  BioModels: Content, Features, Functionality, and Use , 2015, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[51]  J. Denny,et al.  Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine , 2015, Genome Medicine.

[52]  Ulf Leser,et al.  Sequence Factorization with Multiple References , 2015, PloS one.

[53]  Sebastian Deorowicz,et al.  GDC 2: Compression of large collections of genomes , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Carl A. Gunter,et al.  Privacy in the Genomic Era , 2014, ACM Comput. Surv..

[55]  M. Schatz,et al.  Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[56]  Cui Tao,et al.  Developing VISO: Vaccine Information Statement Ontology for patient education , 2015, J. Biomed. Semant..

[57]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[59]  A. Kasarskis,et al.  Erratum: Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project (European Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 24, (14-20)) doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.118) , 2016 .

[60]  Henri-Corto Stoeklé,et al.  23andMe: a new two-sided data-banking market model , 2016, BMC Medical Ethics.

[61]  Dean P. Jones Sequencing the exposome: A call to action , 2015, Toxicology reports.

[62]  Brian T. Naughton,et al.  Analysis of 589,306 genomes identifies individuals resilient to severe Mendelian childhood diseases , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[63]  A. Brand,et al.  Public Health Genomics: the essential part for good governance in public health , 2016, International Journal of Public Health.

[64]  klaguia Epigenome data release: a participant-centered approach to privacy protection , 2016 .

[65]  Eric J. Topol,et al.  Stop the privatization of health data , 2016, Nature.

[66]  H. Hodson Google knows your ills , 2016 .

[67]  S. Kingham,et al.  Social and spatial inequalities in Rotaviral enteritis: a case for universally funded vaccination in New Zealand. , 2016, The New Zealand medical journal.

[68]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[69]  Andy Kill The direct-to-consumer genetics debate. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[70]  Kadija Ferryman,et al.  Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[71]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Erratum: A genome-wide analysis of putative functional and exonic variation associated with extremely high intelligence , 2015, Molecular psychiatry.

[72]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[73]  S. Kienberger,et al.  Modelling homogeneous regions of social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda. , 2016, Geospatial health.

[74]  Emily Seto,et al.  A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management , 2016, Health Informatics J..

[75]  M. Riyad Internet of DNA: A global network of millions of genomes could be medicine’s next great advance , 2016 .

[76]  Xi Li,et al.  SuperMIC: Analyzing Large Biological Datasets in Bioinformatics with Maximal Information Coefficient , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[77]  Riccardo Miotto,et al.  Translational bioinformatics in the era of real-time biomedical, health care and wellness data streams , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..