Responses to affirmative action: Is there a question order affect?

Abstract This paper analyzes the affect of question order on support for affirmative action. While the literature is replete with studies detailing the racial differences for support for affirmative action, there is a dearth of studies that analyze how probing, using open-ended questions, can influence individuals’ responses. Given this, we seek to analyze and explain how open-ended questions, related to affirmative action, might affect responses to close-ended questions as well as how their joint interaction help us to understand resonant attitudes. Using a split-ballot approach, we found that responses to the closedended question were significantly affected by the experimental design.

[1]  K. Quinn,et al.  Attributions of Responsibility and Reactions to Affirmative Action: Affirmative Action as Help , 2001 .

[2]  M. Heilman,et al.  The other side of affirmative action: reactions of nonbeneficiaries to sex-based preferential selection. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  M. Heilman,et al.  Type of affirmative action policy: a determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence , 2001 .

[5]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[6]  B. Weiner,et al.  Hate Welfare But Help the Poor: How the Attributional Content of Stereotypes Explains the Paradox of Reactions to the Destitute in America1 , 2004 .

[7]  C. Steeh,et al.  THE POLLS—TRENDSAFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE PUBLIC, 1970–1995 , 1996 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[9]  Mike Brennan.  The Effect of Question Tone on Responses to Open-Ended Questions , 1997 .

[10]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects , 1993 .

[12]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action , 1997 .

[13]  Michael C. Dawson.  Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics , 1995 .

[14]  J. R. Kluegel,et al.  Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? , 1993 .

[15]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[16]  F. Lynch.  Affirmative Action Is Dead; Long Live Affirmative Action , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[17]  L. Ayers.  Perceptions of affirmative action among its beneficiaries , 1992 .

[18]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America , 2002 .

[19]  J. Sidanius,et al.  Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: the antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  D. Kinder,et al.  Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals , 1996 .

[21]  D. Kinder,et al.  Cracks in American Apartheid: The Political Impact of Prejudice among Desegregated Whites , 1995, The Journal of Politics.

[22]  N. C. Schaeffer,et al.  The Science of Asking Questions , 2003 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[24]  K. Tate.  From protest to politics - the new Black voters in American elections , 1994 .

[25]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reaching Beyond Race , 1997, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[26]  F. Crosby,et al.  Affirmative Action and the Issue of Expectancies , 1990 .

[27]  S. Feldman,et al.  A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences , 1992 .

[28]  Charlotte Steeh,et al.  Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations , 1985 .

[29]  Carl P. Hensler,et al.  Whites' Opposition to “Busing”: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics? , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[31]  J. Sidanius,et al.  The Positive and Negative Framing of Affirmative Action: A Group Dominance Perspective , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[32]  John G. Geer,et al.  DO OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS MEASURE “SALIENT” ISSUES? , 1991 .

[33]  Duane F. Alwin.  Generations X, Y and Z: Are they Changing America? , 2002 .

[34]  F. Crosby,et al.  Affirmative action: Setting the record straight , 1994 .

[35]  Derek R. Avery,et al.  Affirmative Action Programs for Women and Minorities Expressed Support Affected by Question Order , 2008 .

[36]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The origins of symbolic racism. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Christine Reyna,et al.  Searching for Common Ground between Supporters and Opponents of Affirmative Action , 2005 .

[38]  Bärbel Knäuper,et al.  The Impact of Age and Education on Response Order Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1999 .