Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment

Abstract When used to compare the relative environmental performance of different products, life cycle-based, quantitative environmental claims, such as carbon footprint claims and environmental product declarations require common rules in order for claims to be comparable within a category. Product category rules (PCRs), which are defined in the ISO 14025 standard, specify how life cycle environmental impacts should be estimated and reported for products within a given category. The standard has allowed for the development of multiple program operators in different countries, each with its own set of PCRs. We provide a global update on the development of PCRs, describing progress in existing programs and highlighting emerging efforts. As PCRs have begun to proliferate, challenges have arisen that could potentially undermine comparison of life-cycle-based claims for comparable products. These challenges include the definition of the product category, the lack of common data sources, limited geographic scope, and the format of the claim. We present some recommendations on overcoming these challenges and point out some potential mechanisms to support alignment internationally.

[1]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[2]  Joyce Smith Cooper,et al.  Green(er) Product Standard Trends in North America , 2011 .

[3]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Analysing influencing factors of corporate environmental information collection, management and communication , 2009 .

[4]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  David Laner,et al.  The consideration of long-term emissions from landfills within life-cycle assessment , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[6]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Consumer demands on Type III environmental declarations , 2006 .

[7]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  Product category rules and environmental product declarations as tools to promote sustainable products: experiences from a case study of furniture production , 2009 .

[8]  Niels Jungbluth,et al.  Environmental product information (EPI) and LCA , 2011 .

[9]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Development of regional characterization factors for aquatic eutrophication , 2009 .

[10]  Almut Beate Heinrich,et al.  International reference life cycle data system handbook , 2010 .

[11]  Cristina Rocha,et al.  Stepwise environmental product declarations: ten SME case studies , 2008 .

[12]  Marc-Andree Wolf,et al.  Process on “global guidance for LCA databases” , 2011 .

[13]  Bengt Steen,et al.  On uncertainty and sensitivity of LCA-based priority setting , 1997 .

[14]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Toxicity assessment of the main pesticides used in Costa Rica , 2007 .

[15]  Connecticut. North American Industry Classification System (Naics) , 2007 .