From sustainability to well-being: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level

Abstract Indicators describing sustainability and, more recently, well-being have raised considerable interest throughout the world. Much conceptual and empirical research exists focusing on the criteria for sustainability and development of indicators, while relatively few studies examine the actual use and influence of indicators. Employing document analysis and interviews of key actors, we explore the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level and draw forth lessons relevant for topical discussion of the measurement of human well-being. We apply a conceptual model of three main types of indicator use: instrumental, conceptual, and political. The results indicate that the use of sustainability indicators is mainly confined to the ‘indicator circuit’ formed by indicator-developers themselves and actors obliged to use the indicators. The results suggest that direct instrumental use of indicators shows limited potential, whereas conceptual use is the key for enhanced indicator influence in the long term. Political use of indicators cannot be controlled by the indicator-developers.

[1]  Stephen Dovers,et al.  Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics , 2006 .

[2]  P. Burnham.  Research Methods in Politics , 2004 .

[3]  M. Holden.  Community Interests and Indicator System Success , 2009 .

[4]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[5]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Harnessing the power of the press with three indices of sustainable development , 2011 .

[6]  Susan Owens,et al.  Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy , 2005 .

[7]  Erin Murphy-Graham,et al.  An Alternate Route to Policy Influence , 2005 .

[8]  S. Connelly.  Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept , 2007 .

[9]  D. Booher,et al.  Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence , 2000 .

[10]  Jon Hall,et al.  A Framework to measure the progress of societies , 2011 .

[11]  Mariano Rojas,et al.  The ‘Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress’ Report and Quality of Life: Moving Forward , 2011 .

[12]  Other.  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT , 2003 .

[13]  M. Torras.  The Subjectivity Inherent in Objective Measures of Well-Being , 2008 .

[14]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Local Sustainability Indicators , 2003 .

[15]  D. Meadows.  Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development , 2021, The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities.

[16]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[17]  Martha Ann Carey,et al.  Focus Group Research , 2012 .

[18]  J. Lyytimäki,et al.  Skeletons out of the closet: effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators , 2008 .

[19]  A. Hezri,et al.  Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: a framework for utilisation and learning. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Carol Hirschon Weiss,et al.  The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy , 1999 .

[21]  J. Lyytimäki.  Evaluation of sustainable development strategies and policies: The need for more timely indicators , 2012 .

[22]  Jon Hall,et al.  Developing Societal Progress Indicators: A Practical Guide , 2010 .

[23]  Richard Layard,et al.  Measuring Subjective Well-Being , 2010, Science.

[24]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Ecological Indicators: between the two fires of science and policy , 2007 .

[25]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization , 1998 .

[26]  A. Michalos.  What Did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Get Right and What Did They Get Wrong? , 2011 .

[27]  Jochen Jesinghaus.  Measuring European environmental policy performance , 2012 .

[28]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[29]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  Indicators of Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[30]  R. Steurer,et al.  Objectives and Indicators in Sustainable Development Strategies: Similarities and Variances across Europe , 2013 .

[31]  E. Rametsteiner,et al.  Sustainability indicator development-Science or political negotiation? , 2011 .

[32]  A. Dahl.  Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability , 2012 .

[33]  Jari Lyytimäki,et al.  How to approach the sustainable information society? Criteria and indicators as useful tools , 2005 .

[34]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[35]  Ulla Rosenström,et al.  Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Matti Melanen,et al.  The role of co-operation between academia and policymakers for the development and use of sustainability indicators – a case from the Finnish Kymenlaakso Region , 2009 .

[37]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[38]  Thomas Bauler,et al.  An analytical framework to discuss the usability of (environmental) indicators for policy , 2012 .

[39]  Ulla Rosenström.  Sustainable development indicators : Much wanted, less used? , 2009 .

[40]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[41]  J. Lyytimäki,et al.  Russian Dolls and Chinese Whispers: Two Perspectives on the Unintended Effects of Sustainability Indicator Communication , 2014 .

[42]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Four Waves of Evaluation Diffusion , 2010 .