Towards in-vitro prediction of an in-vivo cytostatic response of human tumor cells with a fast chemosensitivity assay.

The objective of this study is to evaluate a novel approach to chemosensitivity testing with respect to its predictive value in the selection of clinically effective cytostatic drugs to optimize the therapeutic treatment of cancer. The chemosensitivity assay, which we used in this study, has its roots in pharmaceutical drug screening and the surrounding intellectual property is protected by various patent applications and trademarks. Therefore, we will refer to this test in the following pages as ChemoSelect. ChemoSelect is a sensor-chip based diagnostic test, which permits the functional and continuous real-time measurement of induced tumor cell cytotoxicity following the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs. Chemosensitivity is measured through the reduction of the excretion of lactic and carbonic acids--by-products of the metabolic processes of glycolysis and respiration and a parameter for cell vitality--generated specifically by ATP hydrolysis and lactic acid production. We used this test to study the applicability of this assay for tumor cells based on the analysis of tumor cell lines and tumor specimens. In this preliminary study, this test was studied in predicting chemoresistance and chemosensitivity in cell lines and tumor specimens for which the result was already predetermined by the properties of the cell line or the tumor specimen used in the experiment. The applicability in a clinical setting was studied by confirming the trends on selected drug sensitivity and drug resistance with an interim analysis of an ongoing clinical study in selected patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The minimum detection limit of cells and biologic cell responses, an important variable determining the applicability of the test in routine clinical use, was also assessed. ChemoSelect avoids many of the limitations of existing chemoresistance assays and provides more comprehensive information and output, as it has a 24-h turnaround time, is applicable to the majority of solid tumors and available cytostatic drugs, does not need more than 10(5) cells in total, cultivated tumor cells, provides dynamic monitoring of cellular responses through on-line data read-out during the perfusion with drugs and can be extended to the analysis of novel therapeutic modalities such as biologics.

[1]  J. Emerman In Vitro Predictive Sensitivity Testing in the Therapeutic Assessment of Breast Cancer , 1989 .

[2]  I. Cree,et al.  Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in human breast carcinoma: use of an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) chemiluminescence assay. , 1993, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  M. Untch,et al.  Comparative chemosensitivity profiles in three human breast cancer cell lines with the ATP-cell viability assay. , 1994, Oncology.

[4]  I. Cree,et al.  Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma. , 1995, Cancer research.

[5]  James B. Mitchell,et al.  Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. , 1987, Cancer research.

[6]  P Catroux,et al.  The silicon microphysiometer for testing ocular toxicity in vitro. , 1993, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[7]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[8]  F W Schildberg,et al.  In vitro toxicology in hepatocyte bioreactors-extracellular acidification rate (EAR) in a target cell line indicates hepato-activated transformation of substrates. , 2000, Toxicology.

[9]  J. W. Parce,et al.  Biosensors based on the energy metabolism of living cells: the physical chemistry and cell biology of extracellular acidification. , 1992, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[10]  I. Cree,et al.  Individualizing chemotherapy for solid tumors--is there any alternative? , 1997, Anti-cancer drugs.

[11]  A. Miyajima,et al.  GM‐CSF triggers a rapid, glucose dependent extracellular acidification by TF‐1 cells: Evidence for sodium/proton antiporter and PKC mediated activation of acid production , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[12]  D. Kern,et al.  Highly specific prediction of antineoplastic drug resistance with an in vitro assay using suprapharmacologic drug exposures. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. Ten-year results. , 1995, JAMA.

[14]  K. Fujita,et al.  Clinical application of an in vitro chemosensitivity test, the Histoculture Drug Response Assay, to urological cancers: wide distribution of inhibition rates in bladder cancer and renal cell cancer , 1999, Urological Research.

[15]  M. Untch,et al.  In vitro potentiation of radiation cytotoxicity by recombinant interferons in cervical cancer cell lines , 1993, Cancer.

[16]  M. Black,et al.  Effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on dehydrogenase activity of human cancer tissue in vitro. , 1953, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  B. Sevin,et al.  Chemosensitivity testing in gynecologic malignancies and breast cancer , 1994 .

[18]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Simultaneous in vitro drug sensitivity testing on tumors from different sites in the same patient , 1986 .

[19]  R. Angioli,et al.  Growth characteristics of nonmalignant cells in the ATP cell viability assay. , 1994, Oncology.

[20]  T. Kubota,et al.  Chemosensitivity of breast cancer lymph node metastasis compared to the primary tumor from individual patients tested in the histoculture drug response assay. , 2000, Anticancer research.

[21]  H. Averette,et al.  Characterization of in vitro chemosensitivity of perioperative human ovarian malignancies by adenosine triphosphate chemosensitivity assay. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  S Pitchford,et al.  Nerve growth factor stimulates rapid metabolic responses in PC12 cells. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.