Response of Small Enterprises to the Pressures of ERP Adoption

Decision to adopt ERP by small enterprises is influenced by external forces due to their dependence on the supply chain. However, certain factors mediate the external forces and alter their influences. This article intends to highlight that the response of small enterprises to the institutional isomorphic pressures in adoption decision of ERP depends on the perception of cost-benefit and the complexity of the organization. A conceptual model was developed and empirically tested by a survey among SMEs of the knitwear garment cluster that has a well developed institutional structure. The mediation effect is tested in SEM software and its significance is verified by bootstrapping. The results show that perceived benefit, challenges and organizational complexity confound the external forces. The study reveals how the small enterprises respond to the external pressures so that stakeholders involved in promotion of ERP can plan a right strategy for encouraging ERP adoption among SMEs.

[1]  A. Hayes Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[2]  Thomas Kalling,et al.  ERP Systems and the Strategic Management Processes that Lead to Competitive Advantage , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[3]  Charalambos Spathis,et al.  The usefulness of ERP systems for effective management , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Enterprise Systems Benefits: How Should They Be Assessed? , 2004, PACIS.

[5]  Edward W. N. Bernroider,et al.  A Preliminary Empirical Study of the Diffusion of ERP Systems in Austrian and British SMEs , 2003 .

[6]  Omur Y. Saatcioglu,et al.  What determines user satisfaction in ERP projects: benefits, barriers or risks? , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[7]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[8]  Jyh-Hong Ding,et al.  Evolutionary strategy to apply information and communication technology: a case study in the apparel industry , 2011 .

[9]  Emad M. Kamhawi Enterprise resource-planning systems adoption in Bahrain: motives, benefits, and barriers , 2008, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Pranab K. Dan,et al.  Factors influencing ERP implementation in Indian manufacturing organisations: A study of micro, small and medium-scale enterprises , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research , 1999, ICIS.

[12]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[13]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[14]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  ERP systems adoption: An exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[16]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[18]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A taxonomy of ERP implementation approaches , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Segmenting and mining the ERP users' perceived benefits using the rough set approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  An Institutional Analysis of Pluralistic Responses to Enterprise System Implementations , 2007, ICIS.

[21]  Zahran Al-Salti,et al.  CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS IN ERP IMPLEMENTATION: A REVIEW , 2008 .

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  R. N. Joshi,et al.  Estimation of total factor productivity in the Indian garment industry , 2010 .

[26]  Iftekhar Hasan,et al.  Effects of Institutional Pressures on Information Technology Investments: An Empirical Investigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[28]  Jeffrey F. Durgee,et al.  Translating values into product wants , 1996 .

[29]  Sandra J. Cereola,et al.  The Performance Effects of Latent Factors on Assimilation of Commercial Open-Source ERP Software on Small-Medium Enterprises , 2008 .

[30]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Adoption and risk of ERP systems in manufacturing SMEs: a positivist case study , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[32]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[33]  Katina Michael,et al.  Unpacking the ERP investment decision: An empirical assessment of the benefits and risks , 2009, ECIS.

[34]  Jian Wang,et al.  What influences ERP beliefs - Logical evaluation or imitation? , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Dave Oliver,et al.  Researching ERP adoption: an internet-based grounded theory approach , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[36]  Woan-Yuh Jang,et al.  Determinants of the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning within the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework: Taiwan's Communications Industry , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[37]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[38]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[39]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding the plant level costs and benefits of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan? , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Christine Oliver,et al.  The Collective Strategy Framework: An Application to Competing Predictions of Isomorphism , 1988 .

[41]  Shih-Wei Chou,et al.  The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[43]  Stephen Burgess,et al.  An ERP Adoption Model for Midsize Businesses , 2010 .

[44]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Donatella Sciuto,et al.  Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[46]  S. Koh,et al.  ERP II: The involvement, benefits and impediments of collaborative information sharing , 2008 .

[47]  She-I Chang,et al.  Critical Factors of ERP Adoption for Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises: An Empirical Study , 2010, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[48]  Wen-Lung Shiau,et al.  Development of measures to assess the ERP adoption of small and medium enterprises , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[49]  K. Vivekanandan,et al.  Export Marketing and the World Wide Web: Perceptions of Export Barriers among Tirupur Knitwear Apparel Exporters - an Empirical Analysis , 2006 .

[50]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: risk and benefit analysis , 2010 .