Tube Map Visualization: Evaluation of a Novel Knowledge Visualization Application for the Transfer of Knowledge in Long-Term Projects

This article introduces two theoretical concepts for the emerging field Knowledge Visualization and discusses a new visualization application that was used to communicate a long-term project to various stakeholders in an organization. First, we introduce a theoretical framework and a model for Knowledge Visualization. The framework and the model identify and relate the key-aspects for successful Knowledge Visualization applications. Next, we present an evaluation of an implemented Knowledge Visualization application: The Tube Map Visualization. A quality development process had to be established in an education centre for health care professions. Traditional project plans, flyers, and mails did not manage to get the attention, did present overview and detail insufficiently, and did not motivate the employees for actions. Because Visual Metaphors are effective for Knowledge Communication we developed a customized Knowledge Map based on the tube system metaphor. The Tube Map Visualization illustrates the whole project, where each tube line represents a target group and each station a milestone. The visualization was printed as a poster and displayed at prominent locations in the organization. The findings of an evaluation indicate that the Tube Map Visualization is a powerful metaphor to communicate a complex project to different target groups and to build up a mutual story. The employees considered it useful because it provides overview and detailed information in one image and because it initiates discussion. The Tube Map Visualization is therefore helpful to complement traditional project plans of (1) long-term projects where (2) different stakeholders are involved. The theoretical framework, the model, and the findings have implications for researchers in the fields of Knowledge Management, Knowledge Visualization, Information Visualization, and Communication Sciences.

[1]  R. Jakobson Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics , 2006 .

[2]  Bernd Weidenmann 9 When Good Pictures Fail: An Information-Processing Approach to the Effect of Illustrations , 1989 .

[3]  Luc Girardin,et al.  Design study: using multiple coordinated views to analyze geo-referenced high-dimensional datasets , 2003, Proceedings International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization - CMV 2003 -.

[4]  R. Gregory Perceptions as hypotheses. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[6]  Myke Gluck,et al.  Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Ken Garland Some general characteristics present in diagrams denoting activity, event and relationship , 1979 .

[8]  George Gerbner,et al.  Toward a general model of communication , 1956 .

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[10]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Cone Trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information , 1991, CHI.

[11]  T. Sebeok,et al.  Style in language , 1962 .

[12]  R. B. Macleod,et al.  A Source Book Of Gestalt Psychology , 1939 .

[13]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[14]  H. Ridley Eye and Brain , 1973 .

[15]  M. Wertheimer A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[16]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[17]  K. Koffka Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[18]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Visualizing abstract information using motion properties of data-driven infoticles , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[19]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[20]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[21]  T. Newcomb An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach , 1992, TOGS.

[23]  Martin J. Eppler The Image of Insight, the Use of Visual Metaphors in the Communication of Knowledge , 2003 .

[24]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[25]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[26]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[27]  H. Lasswell The structure and function of communication in society , 2007 .

[28]  Ganesh S. Oak Information Visualization Introduction , 2022 .

[29]  E. H. Volkart,et al.  The Communication of Ideas , 1953, Mental health.

[30]  Remo Aslak Burkhard,et al.  Towards a Framework and a Model for Knowledge Visualization: Synergies Between Information and Knowledge Visualization , 2005, Knowledge and Information Visualization.

[31]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[32]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments , 1999 .

[33]  D. Schwartz Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[34]  R. Gregory Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1969 .

[35]  H. Bastian Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[36]  J. Bruner On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[37]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[39]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree-maps: a space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures , 1991, Proceeding Visualization '91.

[40]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[41]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models☆ , 1992 .

[42]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[43]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[44]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Exploring Large Graphs in 3D Hyperbolic Space , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[45]  S. Fotios Book Review: Eye and brain; the psychology of seeing, 5th Edition , 2004 .

[46]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[47]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Graphische Semiologie: Diagramme, Netze, Karten , 2010 .

[48]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought , 2000 .

[49]  Sigmar-Olaf Tergan,et al.  Knowledge and Information Visualization: searching for synergies , 2005 .

[50]  Robert E. Horn,et al.  Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century , 1998 .

[51]  Remo Aslak Burkhard,et al.  Learning from architects: the difference between knowledge visualization and information visualization , 2004, Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004..