Predicting calvarial growth in normal and craniosynostotic mice using a computational approach

During postnatal calvarial growth the brain grows gradually and the overlying bones and sutures accommodate that growth until the later juvenile stages. The whole process is coordinated through a complex series of biological, chemical and perhaps mechanical signals between various elements of the craniofacial system. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent a computational model can accurately predict the calvarial growth in wild‐type (WT) and mutant type (MT) Fgfr2C342Y/+ mice displaying bicoronal suture fusion. A series of morphological studies were carried out to quantify the calvarial growth at P3, P10 and P20 in both mouse types. MicroCT images of a P3 specimen were used to develop a finite element model of skull growth to predict the calvarial shape of WT and MT mice at P10. Sensitivity tests were performed and the results compared with ex vivo P10 data. Although the models were sensitive to the choice of input parameters, they predicted the overall skull growth in the WT and MT mice. The models also captured the difference between the ex vivoWT and MT mice. This modelling approach has the potential to be translated to human skull growth and to enhance our understanding of the different reconstruction methods used to manage clinically the different forms of craniosynostosis, and in the long term possibly reduce the number of re‐operations in children displaying this condition and thereby enhance their quality of life.

[1]  S. Mori,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and micro-computed tomography combined atlas of developing and adult mouse brains for stereotaxic surgery , 2009, Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Tissue‐specific responses to aberrant FGF signaling in complex head phenotypes , 2013, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[3]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  A population‐based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003 , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[4]  B. Richmond,et al.  Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[5]  Joan T. Richtsmeier,et al.  Hand in glove: brain and skull in development and dysmorphogenesis , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[6]  Jac Wismans,et al.  MODELING OF THE HUMAN HEAD UNDER IMPACT CONDITIONS: A PARAMETRIC STUDY , 1997 .

[7]  E. Peskett,et al.  Analysis of the Fgfr2C342Y mouse model shows condensation defects due to misregulation of Sox9 expression in prechondrocytic mesenchyme , 2017, Biology Open.

[8]  E. Rayfield Finite Element Analysis and Understanding the Biomechanics and Evolution of Living and Fossil Organisms , 2007 .

[9]  Marek Gzik,et al.  Modeling and biomechanical analysis of craniosynostosis correction with the use of finite element method. , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[10]  R van Noort,et al.  A study of the uniaxial mechanical properties of human dura mater preserved in glycerol. , 1981, Biomaterials.

[11]  A. Dekaban,et al.  Tables of cranial and orbital measurements, cranial volume, and derived indexes in males and females from 7 days to 20 years of age , 1977, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Daniel T. Montoro,et al.  Models of Cranial Suture Biology , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  R. Crompton,et al.  Assessing mechanical function of the zygomatic region in macaques: validation and sensitivity testing of finite element models , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  M. Cohen Editorial: Perspectives on craniosynostosis , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[16]  Zhigang Li,et al.  Development/global validation of a 6-month-old pediatric head finite element model and application in investigation of drop-induced infant head injury , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  S. Aoki,et al.  Magnetic resonance , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  Michael J Fagan,et al.  Validity and sensitivity of a human cranial finite element model: implications for comparative studies of biting performance , 2016, Journal of anatomy.

[19]  D. Shreiber,et al.  Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  Susan W Herring Mechanical influences on suture development and patency. , 2008, Frontiers of oral biology.

[21]  L A Opperman,et al.  Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[22]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Cell Mechanics of Craniosynostosis. , 2017, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[23]  Daniel Govier,et al.  The Craniofacial Phenotype of the Crouzon Mouse: Analysis of a Model for Syndromic Craniosynostosis Using Three-Dimensional MicroCT , 2006, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[24]  M. Moazen,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis to the Role of the Fronto‐Parietal Suture in Lacerta Bilineata: A Preliminary Finite Element Study , 2013, Anatomical record.

[25]  A. Wilkie Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  S. Herring,et al.  Intracranial pressure changes during mouse development. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  A. Gefen,et al.  Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Gillian M Morriss-Kay,et al.  Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[29]  Gillian M Morriss-Kay,et al.  A gain-of-function mutation of Fgfr2c demonstrates the roles of this receptor variant in osteogenesis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Todd C. Pataky,et al.  Functional Evolution of the Feeding System in Rodents , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Michael A. Berthaume,et al.  Functional and evolutionary consequences of cranial fenestration in birds , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  鮫島 浩,et al.  Population-based study からみた神経予後不良因子の検討 , 2009 .

[33]  David Ratel,et al.  AFM mapping of the elastic properties of brain tissue reveals kPa μm(-1) gradients of rigidity. , 2016, Soft matter.

[34]  Lillian Y. Chang,et al.  Age-dependent properties and quasi-static strain in the rat sagittal suture. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  T D Szwedowski,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of a Validated Subject-Specific Finite Element Model of the Human Craniofacial Skeleton , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  Xin Xu,et al.  An MRI-based atlas and database of the developing mouse brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  T. Jason,et al.  Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. , 2008 .

[38]  Mehran Moazen,et al.  Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  D. Rizopoulos,et al.  Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[40]  Erwin Pauws,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Calvarial Bones in a Mouse Model for Craniosynostosis , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  Eric Arnaud,et al.  The Increase of Metopic Synostosis: A Pan-European Observation , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[42]  H. Losken,et al.  A rabbit model of human familial, nonsyndromic unicoronal suture synostosis I. Synostotic onset, pathology, and sutural growth patterns , 1998, Child's Nervous System.

[43]  P. O’Higgins,et al.  Functional Relationship between Skull Form and Feeding Mechanics in Sphenodon, and Implications for Diapsid Skull Development , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  N. Hatch,et al.  Further Analysis of the Crouzon Mouse: Effects of the FGFR2C342Y Mutation Are Cranial Bone–Dependent , 2013, Calcified Tissue International.

[45]  G. Holmes,et al.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis , 2012, Child's Nervous System.