An analysis of interference in recognition memory

A stimulus-sampling model of recognition memory is presented that predicts both proactive and retroactive interference. To test the predictions of the model, a recognition memory experiment was carried out using a standard proactive-retroactive design with a forced-choice task. Both accuracy and latency were measured. The data showed, as predicted, equal proactive and retroactive effects on accuracy, providing solid support for the model. The interference effects are interpreted in terms of the model as arising from an increase in indirect marking, the marking of shared stimulus elements in words other than the study word. The model has two parameters representing the rate of indirect marking for high-frequency and low-frequency words and two parameters reflecting the efficiency of direct marking. The latency results completely paralleled the accuracy findings, showing proactive and retroactive effects. A possible extension of the model to handle latencies is considered.

[1]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[2]  B B Murdock,et al.  Criterion change in continuous recognition memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory , 1976 .

[4]  P. D. Mccormack,et al.  Recognition memory for common and rare words. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[6]  R J AUDLEY,et al.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. , 1960, Psychological review.

[7]  R. Shepard,et al.  Forced-choice tests of recognition memory under steady-state conditions , 1963 .

[8]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Application of a trace model to the retention of information in a recognition task , 1961 .

[9]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[10]  Steven Koppell,et al.  Decision Latencies in Recognition Memory: A Signal Detection Theory Analysis. , 1977 .

[11]  W. Estes.  Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. , 1955, Psychological review.

[12]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[13]  A. W. Melton,et al.  Coding Processes in Human Memory. , 1973 .

[14]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  B. Underwood,et al.  Word Frequency and Short-Term Recognition Memory. , 1970 .

[16]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  J. P. Seward.  Hull's system of behavior: an evaluation. , 1954, Psychological review.

[18]  R. Shepard,et al.  Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[20]  S. Link.  The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Long-Term Memory Search: An Intersecting Activation Process. , 1976 .

[22]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[23]  Arthur I. Schulman,et al.  The Declining course of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.