Comparison between laser scanning, single-image rectification and ground-penetrating radar technologies in forensic science

Abstract The data provided by three different measurement instruments, terrestrial laser scanning, image measurement from rectified photographs and 3D ground-penetrating radar, are compared and analysed in this work. For this purpose, an experimental grave is prepared using human bone remains and a pig carcass. A comparison of the geometrical data collected from the bone remains using laser scanning and single-image rectification show an agreement better than 4% for bones longer than 75 mm, which confirms the possibility of using the low cost image measurement technique for forensic purposes. The volume and weight of the pig carcass is also evaluated using the laser scanning data and a surface model fitted to the point cloud. The obtained result matches with the real data provided by the veterinarian. However, care must be taken to avoid the occlusions of the laser data, which could artificially increase the volume. The ground-penetrating radar survey clearly reveals the place where the pig is buried. The cross-sectional area is evaluated. The volume of the pig detected by GPR was determined and compared with the value obtained from the laser scanning. The results show a difference of about 25%. The ground-penetrating radar survey also shows some evidence of the cranium from the bone remains in the grave. However, the results are not clear, which demonstrates that the reliability of this technique decreases when the tissues of the cadaver are completely degraded.

[1]  Janalt Damstra,et al.  Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[2]  N. J. Malik,et al.  Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[3]  N. Cassidy,et al.  Time‐Lapse Geophysical Investigations over a Simulated Urban Clandestine Grave * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  J. McKinley,et al.  Forensic Geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations , 2005 .

[5]  John J. Schultz,et al.  The Contribution of Forensic Archaeology to Homicide Investigations , 2008 .

[6]  Cristina Cattaneo,et al.  Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[7]  H. Park,et al.  Use of hand-held laser scanning in the assessment of craniometry. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[8]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  Modelling masonry arches shape using terrestrial laser scanning data and nonparametric methods , 2010 .

[9]  D. Congram,et al.  A Clandestine Burial in Costa Rica: Prospection and Excavation , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Standard artifact for the geometric verification of terrestrial laser scanning systems , 2011 .

[11]  John J. Schultz,et al.  Using Ground-Penetrating Radar to Locate Clandestine Graves of Homicide Victims , 2007 .

[12]  M. Collins,et al.  Sequential Monitoring of Burials Containing Large Pig Cadavers Using Ground‐Penetrating Radar , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  CLOSE RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND SOFTWARE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT FOR PLANAR PATTERNS COMPUTATION FOTOGRAMETRÍA TERRESTRE DIGITAL Y APLICACIÓN SOFTWARE PARA EL DESARROLLO DE PATRONES PLANOS , 2009 .

[14]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Interpreting complex, three-dimensional, near-surface GPR surveys: an integrated modelling and inversion approach , 2011 .

[15]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Verification artifact for photogrammetric measurement systems , 2011 .

[16]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Close Range Photogrammetry , 2007 .

[17]  D. Daniels Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[18]  P. Arias,et al.  Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics , 2009 .

[19]  J. Schultz,et al.  Controlled GPR grave research: comparison of reflection profiles between 500 and 250 MHz antennae. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[20]  A. Novo,et al.  3D GPR in forensics: Finding a clandestine grave in a mountainous environment. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[21]  M. Thali,et al.  Optical 3D surface digitizing in forensic medicine: 3D documentation of skin and bone injuries. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[22]  Alastair Ruffell,et al.  Suspect burial excavation procedure: a cautionary tale. , 2009, Forensic science international.