Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactors - How longitudinal gradients influence nitrogen removal - A conceptual study.

[1]  B. Smets,et al.  Counter-diffusion biofilms have lower N2O emissions than co-diffusion biofilms during simultaneous nitrification and denitrification: Insights from depth-profile analysis. , 2017, Water research.

[2]  A. L. Esteban-García,et al.  Periodic venting of MABR lumen allows high removal rates and high gas-transfer efficiencies. , 2017, Water research.

[3]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Improving the accuracy of granular sludge and biofilm reactor simulations in Aquasim through artificial diffusion. , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  B. Smets,et al.  Intermittent Aeration Suppresses Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria in Membrane-Aerated Biofilms: A Model-Based Explanation. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Pierre Lucien Cote,et al.  The role of innovative technologies in achieving energy-neutral wastewater treatment , 2016 .

[6]  H. Ngo,et al.  Autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: Archaeal ammonia oxidation versus bacterial ammonia oxidation , 2016 .

[7]  S. Vlaeminck,et al.  Impact of carbon to nitrogen ratio and aeration regime on mainstream deammonification. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Yifeng Xu,et al.  Achieving Stable Nitritation for Mainstream Deammonification by Combining Free Nitrous Acid-Based Sludge Treatment and Oxygen Limitation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  R. Nerenberg.  The membrane-biofilm reactor (MBfR) as a counter-diffusional biofilm process. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  S. Lackner,et al.  Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures. , 2015, Water research.

[11]  T. Lotti,et al.  Pilot-scale evaluation of anammox-based mainstream nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater , 2015, Environmental technology.

[12]  Yan Zhou,et al.  The challenges of mainstream deammonification process for municipal used water treatment , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Effect of temperature change on anammox activity , 2015, Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

[14]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Sequentially aerated membrane biofilm reactors for autotrophic nitrogen removal: microbial community composition and dynamics , 2013, Microbial biotechnology.

[15]  B. Smets,et al.  Model-based evaluation of the role of Anammox on nitric oxide and nitrous oxide productions in membrane aerated biofilm reactor , 2013 .

[16]  Robbert Kleerebezem,et al.  Nitrogen Removal by a Nitritation-Anammox Bioreactor at Low Temperature , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  B. Smets,et al.  Autotrophic Nitrogen Removal in a Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor Under Continuous Aeration: A Demonstration , 2013 .

[18]  B. Smets,et al.  Effect of the kinetics of ammonium and nitrite oxidation on nitritation success or failure for different biofilm reactor geometries , 2012 .

[19]  Robert Nerenberg,et al.  The membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) for water and wastewater treatment: principles, applications, and recent developments. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[20]  R. Nerenberg,et al.  Effect of oxygen gradients on the activity and microbial community structure of a nitrifying, membrane‐aerated biofilm , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Susanne Lackner,et al.  Heterotrophic activity compromises autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: results of a modeling study. , 2008, Water research.

[22]  Shinya Matsumoto,et al.  Modeling of membrane-aerated biofilm: Effects of C/N ratio, biofilm thickness and surface loading of oxygen on feasibility of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification , 2007 .

[23]  B. Smets,et al.  Redox‐stratification controlled biofilm (ReSCoBi) for completely autotrophic nitrogen removal: The effect of co‐ versus counter‐diffusion on reactor performance , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  John W. Shanahan,et al.  Influence of a nitrifying biofilm on local oxygen fluxes across a micro-porous flat sheet membrane , 2006 .

[25]  V. Voller,et al.  Advective flow through membrane-aerated biofilms Modeling results , 2006 .

[26]  John W. Shanahan,et al.  Multipopulation model of membrane-aerated biofilms. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  S. Tsuneda,et al.  Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by controlling vertical and horizontal microenvironment in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. , 2003, Journal of biotechnology.

[28]  Xiaodi Hao,et al.  Model-based evaluation of temperature and inflow variations on a partial nitrification-ANAMMOX biofilm process. , 2002, Water research.

[29]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a biofilm model describing a one-stage completely autotrophic nitrogen removal (CANON) process. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  B. Glennon,et al.  Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: effect of intra-membrane oxygen pressure on performance , 2000 .

[31]  V. Voller,et al.  Modeling biofilms on gas-permeable supports : Concentration and activity profiles , 2000 .

[32]  B. Glennon,et al.  Review of membrane aerated biofilm reactors , 1999 .

[33]  T. Stephenson,et al.  Membrane aeration bioreactors for wastewater treatment: completely mixed and plug-flow operation , 1999 .

[34]  B. Glennon,et al.  Oxygen mass transfer characteristics in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  I. Röske,et al.  Gradients in the taxonomic composition of different microbial systems: Comparison between biofilms for advanced waste treatment and lake sediments , 1998 .

[36]  M. Strous,et al.  Effects of aerobic and microaerobic conditions on anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) sludge , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[37]  Peter Reichert,et al.  Concepts underlying a computer program for the identification and simulation of aquatic systems , 1994 .