Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical Review

The literature on gender differences in touch is divided into the categories of observational studies of touch frequency, people's beliefs about frequency and meaning, data on qualitative differences in touch, and studies of response to touch. The observational studies reveal: (a) no overall tendency for males to touch females more than vice versa, though two studies of specifically intentional touch with the hand did find such asymmetry; (b) a tendency for females to initiate touch more than males; (c) a questionable tendency for females to receive touch more than males; (d) a tendency for more female same-gender touch than male same-gender touch (at least for white samples); and (e) a tendency for same-gender dyads to touch more than opposite-gender dyads, especially when the dyads are unlikely to be intimate. Some of these conclusions are debatable, owing to methodologica l problems.1 Data dealing with qualitative aspects of touch are found to be too sparse and inconsistent to yield much information about gender differences in the uses or meanings of particular types of touch. The literature shows a tendency for women to respond more positively to touch than men. Henley's power hypothesis, the primary hypothesis concerning gender differences in touch, is given special scrutiny as a possible explanatory framework. Despite the psychological significance of touch as a means of communication , not a great deal is known about when and why touching occurs and what meaning it may have in same-gender and opposite-gender interaction. Studies on the topic of gender and touch have focused on observed occurrences of touch, self-reports of touch frequency, people's beliefs about the meanings of touch, observers' perceptions of interactions that involved touch, and empirically assessed response to touch. Relevant questions and methods are many and the literature smaller than we would wish, considering this variety. But the literature is actually much larger than most psychologists alluding to the topic seem to be aware of; a handful of studies at best, and usually the same ones, are generally cited. There has been only one substantial review of gender and touch, that of Major (1981), whose review differs from

[1]  Richard T. Brown,et al.  Address in American English. , 1961 .

[2]  S. Jourard,et al.  An exploratory study of body-accessibility. , 1966, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[3]  Larry L. Tifft.  Sociofugal Space , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  S. Jourard,et al.  Self-Disclosure and Touching: A Study of Two Modes of Interpersonal Encounter and Their Inter-Relation , 1968 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  J. Baxter.  Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. , 1970, Sociometry.

[7]  William R. Berkowitz,et al.  A Cross-National Comparison of Some Social Patterns of Urban Pedestrians , 1971 .

[8]  James P. Batchelor,et al.  Spatial Arrangements in Freely Formed Groups 1 , 1972 .

[9]  The effects of tactile stimulation on visual experience. , 1972, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  J. Langlois,et al.  The influence of sex of peer on the social behavior of preschool children. , 1973 .

[11]  N. Henley.  Status and sex: Some touching observations , 1973 .

[12]  Early Social Behavior: Age and Sex Baseline Data from a Hidden Population , 1974 .

[13]  J. Lomranz,et al.  Communicative patterns of self-disclosure and touching behavior. , 1974, The Journal of psychology.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  R. Heslin,et al.  The meanings of touch: sex differences. , 1975, The Journal of communication.

[16]  Frank N. Willis,et al.  Development of Tactile Patterns in Relation to Age, Sex, and Race. , 1975 .

[17]  J. W. Whiting,et al.  Children of Six Cultures: A Psycho-Cultural Analysis , 1975 .

[18]  L B Rosenfeld,et al.  Body accessibility revisited. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[19]  Attribution of personal characteristics as a function of the degree of touch on initial contact and sex , 1976 .

[20]  F. N. Willis,et al.  Interpersonal Touch in High School Relative to Sex and Race , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  F. N. Willis,et al.  Touch interactions in junior high students in relation to sex and race. , 1976 .

[22]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[23]  R. Shuter.  Proxemics and tactility in Latin America. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[24]  David R. Maines,et al.  Tactile relationships in the subway as affected by racial, sexual, and crowded seating situations , 1977 .

[25]  Differences between Mexican-American and White Children in Interpersonal Distance and Social Touching , 1977 .

[26]  R. Buck.  Nonverbal communication of affect in preschool in children: relationships with personality and skin conductance. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Antony J. Chapman,et al.  Friendship and social responsiveness in boys and girls. , 1977 .

[28]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. , 1977 .

[29]  Marital Communication: Subtle Cues Between Newlyweds. , 1977 .

[30]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[31]  B. Lott.  Behavioral Concordance with Sex Role Ideology Related to Play Areas, Creativity, and Parental Sex Typing of Children. , 1978 .

[32]  Robert W. Suchner,et al.  Power implications of touch in male—Female relationships , 1978 .

[33]  J. Connor,et al.  Patterns of Touching between Preschool Children and Male and Female Teachers. , 1978 .

[34]  Interpersonal Touch among Adults in Cafeteria Lines , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[35]  Interpersonal Touch Among Preschool Children at Play , 1978 .

[36]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[37]  P. Andersen,et al.  The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance , 1978 .

[38]  W. Rago,et al.  Relationship between the frequency of touching and status in institutionalized profoundly retarded , 1978 .

[39]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Touch, Justification, and Sex: Influences on the Aversiveness of Spatial Violations. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[40]  R. Borden,et al.  Handedness and lateral positioning in heterosexual couples: Are men still strong-arming women? , 1978 .

[41]  J. Fisher,et al.  Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  T. Silverman,et al.  Physical contact and sexual behavior on prime time TV , 1979 .

[43]  R. Shuter.  A Study of Nonverbal Communication among Jews and Protestants , 1979 .

[44]  Success and interpersonal touch in a competitive setting , 1980 .

[45]  F. N. Willis,et al.  The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance , 1980 .

[46]  Catherine Radecki,et al.  Sex as a Status Variable in Work Settings: Female and Male Reports of Dominance Behavior , 1980 .

[47]  P. Greenbaum,et al.  Varieties of touching in greetings: Sequential structure and sex-related differences , 1980 .

[48]  Interpersonal touch among residents of homes for the elderly. , 1980, The Journal of communication.

[49]  R. Heslin,et al.  Nonverbal Intimacy in Airport Arrival and Departure , 1980 .

[50]  P. Noller.  Cross-gender effect in two-child families , 1980 .

[51]  Allan Dye,et al.  Effects of Counselor Touch on Counseling Outcome. , 1980 .

[52]  B. Major.  Gender Patterns in Touching Behavior , 1981 .

[53]  J. DiPietro,et al.  Rough and tumble play: A function of gender. , 1981 .

[54]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Interpersonal touching as a function of status and sex. , 1981 .

[55]  J. Lochman,et al.  Nonverbal communication of couples in conflict. , 1981 .

[56]  Status and touching behavior , 1981 .

[57]  Carie Forden.  The influence of sex-role expectations on the perception of touch , 1981 .

[58]  R. Heslin,et al.  Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive , 1982 .

[59]  F. N. Willis,et al.  A personal log method for investigating interpersonal touch. , 1983, The Journal of psychology.