Prediction of liquid - solid wetting efficiency in trickle flow reactors

Abstract A comprehensive database of catalyst wetting efficiency measurements in trickle flow regime was gathered from 14 independent studies to conduct a thorough evaluation of the performances of current correlations for the prediction of wetting efficiency during vertical gas-liquid co-current down-flow in randomly packed fixed bed reactors. Cross-examined with the database, several shortcomings arising from a low level of accuracy or a lack in generalization revealed the weakness of existing estimation methods. An approach relying on the combination of artificial neural network computing and dimensional analysis (ANNDA approach) helped to derive a highly accurate correlation for wetting efficiency in trickle flow regime. This correlation yielded an absolute average relative error of 8% and a standard deviation of 10%. The five dimensionless groups intervening in the proposed correlation were a composite two-phase low Reynolds, Re g , liquid Stokes (St), Froude (Fr) and Galileo (Ga) groups and a bed correction factor (S b ).

[1]  F. Larachi,et al.  Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Three-Phase Fluidized-Bed Reactors , 2000 .

[2]  Andrzej Burghardt,et al.  Experimental studies of liquid—solid wetting efficiency in trickle-bed cocurrent reactors , 1990 .

[3]  D. González-Mendizabal,et al.  Liquid}solid wetting factor in trickle-bed reactors: its determination by a physical method , 1999 .

[4]  Ruben G. Carbonell,et al.  hydrodynamic parameters for gas-liquid cocurrent flow in packed beds , 1985 .

[5]  V. Specchia,et al.  Packing wetting in trickle bed reactors: Influence of the gas flow rate , 1981 .

[6]  R. Missen,et al.  Trickle‐bed reactors: Tracer study of liquid holdup and wetting efficiency at high temperature and pressure , 1991 .

[7]  M. Herskowitz,et al.  Global rates of reaction in trickle-bed reactors: effects of gas and liquid flow rates , 1983 .

[8]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Catalyst wetting efficiency in trickle-bed reactors at high pressure , 1995 .

[9]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Oxidation of sulfur dioxide in a trickle-bed reactor , 1981 .

[10]  J. Levec,et al.  Solid‐liquid mass transfer in packed beds with cocurrent downward two‐phase flow , 1990 .

[11]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors: A Review , 1997 .

[12]  Raghunath V. Chaudhari,et al.  A trickle-bed reactor model for hydrogenation of 2,4 dinitrotoluene: experimental verification , 1998 .

[13]  D. González-Mendizabal,et al.  Solid-liquid mass transfer and wetting factors in trickle bed reactors : Effect of the type of solid phase and the presence of chemical reaction , 1998 .

[14]  J. Smith,et al.  Hydration of isobutene in a trickle‐bed reactor: Wetting efficiency and mass transfer , 1987 .

[15]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Double‐slit model for partially wetted trickle flow hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[16]  N. Fígoli,et al.  Colorimetric evaluation of the efficiency of liquid-solid contacting in trickle flow , 1988 .

[17]  Fernando V. Díez,et al.  Determination of Wetting Efficiency in Trickle-Bed Reactors by a Reaction Method , 1997 .

[18]  A. Biçer,et al.  THE RELATION BETWEEN WETTING EFFICIENCY AND LIQUID HOLDUP IN PACKED COLUMNS , 1994 .

[19]  G. Baldi,et al.  Solid-Liquid Mass Transfer in Concurrent Two-Phase Flow through Packed Beds , 1978 .

[20]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Evaluation of liquid‐solid contacting in trickle‐bed reactors by tracer methods , 1981 .