Parameter estimation for dynamic microbial inactivation: which model, which precision?

Abstract Ordinary least squares (OLS) one-step regression and the sequential procedure were applied to estimate the dynamic thermal microbial inactivation parameters of Escherichia coli K12 using the differential form of five different models. The best-performing models based on their statistical assessment were, in order: Geeraerd et al. sublethal (7 parameters), Geeraerd et al. stress adaptive (7 parameters); reduced Geeraerd et al. (6 parameters), Weibull (6 parameters), and the first-order model (5 parameters) all integrated with the secondary Bigelow model. The statistics used to evaluate the models were: lowest AIC c , minimum root mean square error (RMSE); distribution of residuals; asymptotic relative errors of parameters; scaled sensitivity coefficients; and sequential estimation. RMSE for the first-order model was more than twice that for Geeraerd et al. sublethal model, showing that the first-order model was inappropriate for these data. The optimum reference temperature ( T ref ) for the secondary model (Bigelow type) was interpolated by estimating all other parameters for different fixed T ref values, and choosing T ref that minimized the correlation coefficient between Asym D ref and z . The advantage of finding the optimum T ref was that it minimized the relative error for Asym D ref . Scaled sensitivity coefficients of the Geeraerd et al. sublethal model revealed that a) none of the parameters was linearly correlated with others, and b) that the most easily estimated parameters were the three initial microbial concentrations log N (0), followed by Asym D ref , z , log C c (0), and sublethal β . The sequential method was also applied to estimate updated parameter values by successively adding each data point. Sequential results showed that each parameter reached a constant after ∼2.5 log reductions. These results show that a) parameters may be affected by rate of heating, and b) dynamic microbial inactivation parameters can be estimated accurately and precisely, directly from few experiments, potentially eliminating the need to apply isothermal parameters to dynamic industrial processes.

[1]  Ashim K. Datta,et al.  Error estimates for approximate kinetic parameters used in food literature , 1993 .

[2]  James V. Beck,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science , 1977 .

[3]  Kirk D. Dolan,et al.  Estimation of Kinetic Parameters for Nonisothermal Food Processes , 2003 .

[4]  M. Peleg,et al.  Dynamic Model of Heat Inactivation Kinetics for Bacterial Adaptation , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  F. David,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science , 1977 .

[6]  Lihan Huang Thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in ground beef under isothermal and dynamic temperature conditions , 2009 .

[7]  B. Marks,et al.  Modeling the effect of prior sublethal thermal history on the thermal inactivation rate of Salmonella in ground turkey. , 2008, Journal of food protection.

[8]  A. Christopoulos,et al.  Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting , 2004 .

[9]  J. Impe,et al.  Microbial dynamics versus mathematical model dynamics: The case of microbial heat resistance induction , 2006 .

[10]  A H Geeraerd,et al.  Structural model requirements to describe microbial inactivation during a mild heat treatment. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[11]  J. V. Van Impe,et al.  Stress‐adaptive responses by heat under the microscope of predictive microbiology , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[12]  I. Mohamed Development of a simple and robust inverse method for determination of thermal diffusivity of solid foods , 2010 .

[13]  J. Sofos,et al.  Heat and acid tolerance responses of Listeria monocytogenes as affected by sequential exposure to hurdles during growth. , 2009, Journal of food protection.

[14]  J. V. Van Impe,et al.  Identification of non-linear microbial inactivation kinetics under dynamic conditions. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[15]  Marcio Schwaab,et al.  Optimum reference temperature for reparameterization of the Arrhenius equation. Part 1 : Problems involving one kinetic constant , 2007 .

[16]  Peter L. Bonate,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling And Simulation , 2005 .

[17]  J. V. Van Impe,et al.  Towards the quantification of the effect of acid treatment on the heat tolerance of Escherichia coli K12 at lethal temperatures. , 2011, Food microbiology.

[18]  I. Mohamed Simultaneous estimation of thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity for solid foods using sequential parameter estimation technique , 2009 .

[19]  M. Hendrickx,et al.  Assessing the optimal experiment setup for first order kinetic studies by Monte Carlo analysis , 2005 .

[20]  Roos D. Servaes,et al.  Optimal temperature input design for estimation of the square root model parameters: parameter accuracy and model validity restrictions. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[21]  A H Geeraerd,et al.  Inactivation model equations and their associated parameter values obtained under static acid stress conditions cannot be used directly for predicting inactivation under dynamic conditions. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[22]  I. Albert,et al.  A modified Weibull model for bacterial inactivation. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.