Extended therapy with ipratropium is associated with improved lung function in patients with COPD. A retrospective analysis of data from seven clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE Bronchodilators are routinely used in the long-term therapy of patients with COPD. These drugs are generally evaluated for their short-term bronchodilatory effects. Long-term and short-term benefits, however, are not necessarily equivalent. We evaluated, therefore, the effects of extended therapy with inhaled bronchodilators in patients with COPD. DESIGN Data were obtained from seven clinical trials in which ipratropium was compared with a beta-agonist over a 90-day treatment interval. This comprised all the available data from clinical trials performed for registration of ipratropium and included 1,445 evaluable patients. Results of pulmonary function tests were evaluated prior to and after short-term administration of bronchodilator both before and after the 90-day treatment period. In addition, data were analyzed after stratification for smoking status and for lung function. RESULTS Long-term therapy with ipratropium resulted in improvement in baseline (ie, before short-term administration of bronchodilator) FEV1 (28 mL; p < 0.01) and FVC (131 mL; p < 0.01), while long-term therapy with beta-agonist resulted in no significant change in FEV1 (1-mL decline; p > 0.2) or in FVC (20-mL improvement; p > 0.2). The improvement in baseline function in the ipratropium-treated patients was most marked in ex-smokers (average duration of abstinence, 9 years). Short-term administration of ipratropium following the 90-day treatment interval resulted in similar response in average FEV1 (6 mL more improvement after the extended therapy; p > 0.2) and an increased response in average FVC (44 mL more improvement after extended therapy; p < 0.01). In contrast, extended therapy with beta-agonist resulted in significantly less response to the short-term administration of beta-agonist for both FEV1 (49 mL less response; p < 0.0001) and FVC (74 mL less response; p < 0.0001). Assessed as the percentage of patients who achieved a 15% improvement in lung function, most patients responded to both treatments both before and after extended therapy. There was, however, a significant decline in the number of patients who responded after extended therapy, and this was more marked for the beta-agonist treated group. CONCLUSION Long-term benefits of bronchodilator therapy appear to differ from short-term effects. Extended administration of ipratropium appears to be associated with improved baseline lung function and perhaps with improvement in the response to acute bronchodilation. Extended administration of beta-agonist, in contrast, appears to have little effect on baseline lung function, but may decrease response to acute bronchodilation.

[1]  C. van Weel,et al.  Continuous and on demand use of bronchodilators in patients with non-steroid dependent asthma and chronic bronchitis: four-year follow-up randomized controlled study. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  W. Bailey,et al.  Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1 , 1994 .

[3]  A. Buist,et al.  In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone: An 85-day multicenter trial , 1994 .

[4]  A. Buist,et al.  Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Early Intervention Trial (Lung Health Study). Baseline characteristics of randomized participants. , 1993, Chest.

[5]  Pierre Ernst,et al.  The Use of β-Agonists and the Risk of Death and near Death from Asthma , 1992 .

[6]  S. Braun,et al.  Comparison of ipratropium bromide and albuterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a three-center study. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  J Crane,et al.  Prescribed fenoterol and death from asthma in New Zealand, 1981-7: a further case-control study. , 1991, Thorax.

[8]  C. Print,et al.  Regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma , 1990, The Lancet.

[9]  C. van Weel,et al.  Increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness after inhaling salbutamol during 1 year is not caused by subsensitization to salbutamol. , 1990, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[10]  J. Earis,et al.  Assessment of reversibility of airway obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease. , 1990, Thorax.

[11]  N. Pearce,et al.  Case-control study of prescribed fenoterol and death from asthma in New Zealand, 1977-81. , 1990, Thorax.

[12]  T. Petty,et al.  Dose Response to Ipratropium as a Nebulized Solution in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Reply , 1989 .

[13]  M. Dunst Dose response to ipratropium as a nebulized solution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[14]  T. Petty,et al.  Dose response to ipratropium as a nebulized solution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A three-center study. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[15]  N. Pearce,et al.  PRESCRIBED FENOTEROL AND DEATH FROM ASTHMA IN NEW ZEALAND, 1981-83; CASE-CONTROL STUDY , 1989, The Lancet.

[16]  I. Cowan Comparison of the anticholinergic bronchodilator ipratropium bromide with metaproterenol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Tashkin DP, Ashutosh K, Bleecker ER, et al Am J Med 81 (suppl 5A):81–90 Nov 1986 , 1987 .

[17]  E. Bleecker,et al.  Comparison of the anticholinergic bronchodilator ipratropium bromide with metaproterenol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A 90-day multi-center study. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. , 1986, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[19]  B Kirshner,et al.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[20]  G. Guyatt Methodologic problems in clinical trials in heart failure. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[21]  M. Chan-yeung,et al.  Host factors affecting longitudinal decline in lung spirometry among grain elevator workers. , 1984, Chest.

[22]  T. B. Stretton,et al.  Dose-response comparison of ipratropium bromide from a metered-dose inhaler and by jet nebulisation. , 1983, Thorax.

[23]  J. Lellouch,et al.  Occupational exposure and 12-year spirometric changes among Paris area workers. , 1982, British journal of industrial medicine.

[24]  E. Schachter,et al.  Smoking and lung function. , 1981, The American review of respiratory disease.

[25]  J. Slodkowska,et al.  The tissue response to exogenous elastase. , 1980, Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire.

[26]  J. Lellouch,et al.  Twelve years spirometric changes among Paris area workers. , 1979, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  W. Jędrychowski A consideration of risk factors and development of chronic bronchitis in a five-year follow-up study of an industrial population. , 1979, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[28]  W. Baigelman,et al.  Bronchodilator action of the anticholinergic drug, ipratropium bromide (Sch 1000), as an aerosol in chronic bronchitis and asthma. , 1977, Chest.

[29]  M. Lebowitz,et al.  Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and ventilatory function. , 1977, The American review of respiratory disease.

[30]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Medical audit , 1975, The Lancet.