Data Sharing in CSCR: Towards In-Depth Long Term Collaboration

In this chapter, the authors show the importance of data in the research process and the potential benefit for communities to share research data. Although most of their references are taken from the fields of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Systems, they claim that their argument applies to any other field studying complex situations that need to be analyzed by different disciplines, methods, and instruments. The authors point out the evolution of scientific publication, especially its openness and the variety of its emerging forms. This leads them to propose corpora as boundary objects for various communities in the scientific sphere. Data release being itself a complex problem, the authors use the Mulce1 experience to show how sharable data can be built and made available. Once corpora are considered available, they discuss the potential of their reuse for multiple analyses or derivation. They focus on analytic representations and their combination with initial data or complementary analytic representations by presenting a tool named Tatiana. Finally, the authors propose their vision of data sharing in a world where scientists would use social network applications.

[1]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technological affordances for productive multivocality in analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Dan Suthers,et al.  Productive multivocality in the analysis of collaborative learning , 2010, ICLS.

[3]  Jean-Jacques Girardot,et al.  Tatiana, un environnement d'aide à l'analyse de traces d'interactions humaines , 2010, Tech. Sci. Informatiques.

[4]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  One-to-One Technology-Enhanced Learning: an Opportunity for Global Research Collaboration , 2006, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[5]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Unleashing the killer corpus: experiences in creating the multi-everything AMI Meeting Corpus , 2007, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[6]  Gary King,et al.  An Introduction to the Dataverse Network as an Infrastructure for Data Sharing , 2007 .

[7]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Towards an XML-Based Representation of Collaborative Action , 2003, CSCL.

[8]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[9]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  a la structuration de corpus d'apprentissage pour un meilleur partage en recherche , 2008 .

[10]  Marie-Laure Betbeder,et al.  Sharing Corpora and Tools to Improve Interaction Analysis , 2009, EC-TEL.

[11]  Rob Koper,et al.  Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML , 2001 .

[12]  Lina Markauskaite,et al.  Enhancing and scaling-up design-based research: the potential of e-research , 2008, ICLS.

[13]  Kristine Lund,et al.  Using analysis of computer-mediated synchronous interactions to understand co-designers’ activities and reasoning , 2007 .

[14]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[15]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[16]  Kristine Lund,et al.  An empirical study of engineering knowledge dynamics in a design situation , 2007 .

[17]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Yannis Dimitriadis,et al.  Using a Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of Sequentiability, Reusability and Complexity of Development in CSCL Applications , 2001 .

[19]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Exploratory sequential data analysis: exploring continuous observational data , 1996, INTR.

[20]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics , 2009, Scientometrics.

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[22]  John Willinsky,et al.  A Survey of the Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems , 2010 .

[23]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  An Open Repository and analysis tools for fine-grained, longitudinal learner data , 2008, EDM.

[24]  Christophe Reffay,et al.  Productive re-use of CSCL data and analytic tools to provide a new perspective on group cohesion , 2011, CSCL.

[25]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Citing and Reading Behaviors of High-Energy Physics or How a Community Stopped Worrying about Journals and Learned to Love Repositories , 2009 .

[26]  John J. Godfrey,et al.  SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[27]  Jean-Jacques Girardot,et al.  Tatiana: an environment to support the CSCL analysis process , 2009, CSCL.