Social sensitivity: a manifesto for CSCL research

Technologies for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) are playing an increasingly prominent role in educational contexts, especially as teachers and students strive to deal with pandemic-related constraints. However, the technologies being used for collaboration on a daily basis are not sufficiently equipped to promote collaborative learning as both a cognitive and a socio-emotional process. They may even run the risk of hindering the constructive exchange of ideas and provoking disputes and negative encounters. In this squib, we argue that the field of CSCL is failing to address this risk, because our research efforts are far too scattered and siloed. We introduce a manifesto of social sensitivity: increasing interdisciplinary efforts to enhance constructively critical, respectful, and cohesive collaborations in technology-supported environments. We call for concrete actions in CSCL research that ultimately contribute to more democratic and equitable collaborations.

[1]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  Collaboration Analytics Need More Comprehensive Models and Methods: An Opinion Paper , 2021, J. Learn. Anal..

[2]  How a Power Game Shapes Expressing Opinions in a Chat and in an Argument Graph during a Debate: A Case Study , 2012, ICLS.

[3]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom II: Power and learning , 1984 .

[4]  Individual differences in beliefs about groups. , 2009 .

[5]  David R. Traum,et al.  Cooperation, dialogue and ethics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  M. Baker,et al.  Paper and computers: gender differences in children's conversations in collaborative activities , 2013 .

[7]  Murat Öztok,et al.  Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions , 2016, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[8]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Contribution to a theory of CSCL scripts: taking into account the appropriation of scripts by learners , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[9]  R. Riggio Assessment of Basic Social Skills , 1986 .

[10]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  'Co-Alienation' Mediated By Common Representations in Synchronous E-Discussions , 2012, CSCL.

[11]  Wayne Holmes,et al.  Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education , 2016 .

[12]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[13]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context , 2014 .

[14]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Explanatory learner models: Why machine learning (alone) is not the answer , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Connecting agents and artifacts in CSCL: Towards a rationale of mutual shaping , 2012, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[16]  Robb Lindgren,et al.  Generating a learning stance through perspective-taking in a virtual environment , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Discovering Emotion in Classroom Motivation Research , 2002 .

[18]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[19]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learning , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  G. Stahl Theories of Cognition in Collaborative Learning , 2013 .

[21]  The unit of analysis in learning research: Approaches for imagining a transformative agenda , 2020 .

[22]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Finding a place for equity in CSCL: ambitious learning practices as a lever for sustained educational change , 2020, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[23]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[24]  Hayley Hung,et al.  New Frontiers in Analyzing Dynamic Group Interactions: Bridging Social and Computer Science , 2017, Small group research.

[25]  Jason M. Harley,et al.  Developing Emotion-Aware, Advanced Learning Technologies: A Taxonomy of Approaches and Features , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[26]  Elisabeth Beaunoyer,et al.  COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies , 2020, Computers in Human Behavior.

[27]  Kristine Lund,et al.  Group emotions: the social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation , 2016, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[28]  N. Law,et al.  Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions , 2013 .

[29]  G. Chanel,et al.  Sharing Emotions Contributes to Regulating Collaborative Intentions in Group Problem-Solving , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[30]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[31]  J. Elizabeth Richey,et al.  When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning , 2015 .

[32]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  INTRODUCTION: Visions of learning together , 2013 .

[33]  Luís Francisco Mendes Gabriel Pedro,et al.  A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[34]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2017 .

[35]  George Siemens,et al.  Increasing the Impact of Learning Analytics , 2019, LAK.

[36]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning , 2020 .

[37]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Convergences of Joint, Positive Interactions and Regulation in Collaborative Learning , 2019, Small Group Research.

[38]  Fabien Ringeval,et al.  Grand Challenge Problem 2: Adaptive Awareness for Social Regulation of Emotions in Online Collaborative Learning Environments , 2016 .

[39]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[40]  Irina Verenikina,et al.  Socio-emotional connections: identity, belonging and learning in online interactions. A literature review , 2014 .

[41]  Kristine Lund,et al.  Beyond Just Getting Our Word Out: Creating Pipelines From Learning Sciences Research to Educational Practices , 2016, ICLS.

[42]  Gursimran Singh Walia,et al.  Social sensitivity and classroom team projects: an empirical investigation , 2012, SIGCSE '12.

[43]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  Promoting interaction in online distance education: designing, implementing and supporting collaborative learning , 2020, Information and Learning Sciences.

[44]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Social Aspects of CSCL Environments: A Research Framework , 2013 .

[45]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[46]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[47]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies , 2020, Educational technology research and development : ETR & D.

[48]  N. Mercer The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom , 1996, Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge.

[49]  Raija H. Hämäläinen,et al.  Deep Networks for Collaboration Analytics: Promoting Automatic Analysis of Face-to-Face Interaction in the Context of Inquiry-Based Learning , 2021, J. Learn. Anal..

[50]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Visions of CSCL: eight provocations for the future of the field , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[51]  Anastasia D. Elder,et al.  Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[52]  Mutlu Cukurova,et al.  Supervised machine learning in multimodal learning analytics for estimating success in project-based learning , 2018, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[53]  Richard Alterman,et al.  Cohesion in online environments , 2019, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[54]  Emma Mary Mercier,et al.  Towards a micro-ecological approach to CSCL , 2019, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[55]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[56]  Andrew McStay Emotional AI and EdTech: serving the public good? , 2020, Learning, Media and Technology.

[57]  Murat Oztok Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions , 2016 .

[58]  Paul Kirchner,et al.  Arguing to learn , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[60]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Deliberative emotional talk , 2019, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[61]  Amy Ogan,et al.  Rudeness and Rapport: Insults and Learning Gains in Peer Tutoring , 2012, ITS.