The processing of facial identity and expression is interactive, but dependent on task and experience

Facial identity and emotional expression are two important sources of information for daily social interaction. However the link between these two aspects of face processing has been the focus of an unresolved debate for the past three decades. Three views have been advocated: (1) separate and parallel processing of identity and emotional expression signals derived from faces; (2) asymmetric processing with the computation of emotion in faces depending on facial identity coding but not vice versa; and (3) integrated processing of facial identity and emotion. We present studies with healthy participants that primarily apply methods from mathematical psychology, formally testing the relations between the processing of facial identity and emotion. Specifically, we focused on the “Garner” paradigm, the composite face effect and the divided attention tasks. We further ask whether the architecture of face-related processes is fixed or flexible and whether (and how) it can be shaped by experience. We conclude that formal methods of testing the relations between processes show that the processing of facial identity and expressions interact, and hence are not fully independent. We further demonstrate that the architecture of the relations depends on experience; where experience leads to higher degree of inter-dependence in the processing of identity and expressions. We propose that this change occurs as integrative processes are more efficient than parallel. Finally, we argue that the dynamic aspects of face processing need to be incorporated into theories in this field.

[1]  J. Townsend,et al.  A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. , 2004, Psychological review.

[2]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expression Influences the Recognition of Familiar Faces , 2004, Perception.

[3]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The influence of ingroup/outgroup categorization on same- and other-race face processing: The moderating role of inter- versus intra-racial context , 2011 .

[5]  B. Rossion The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception , 2013 .

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30 , 2011, Cognition.

[7]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Structural imaging reveals anatomical alterations in inferotemporal cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[10]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Are faces special? A case of pure prosopagnosia , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  J. N. Bassili Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Pia Rotshtein,et al.  Differential interactions between identity and emotional expression in own and other-race faces: effects of familiarity revealed through redundancy gains. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  R. Pearson,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? , 2001, Neurocase.

[14]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysis. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[17]  J. Townsend,et al.  Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Marty G. Woldorff,et al.  Momentary reductions of attention permit greater processing of irrelevant stimuli , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between Identity and Emotional Expression in Face Processing across the Lifespan: Evidence from Redundancy Gains , 2014, Journal of aging research.

[20]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Do Expression and Identity Need Separate Representations? , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[22]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: A neurophysiological analysis , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[25]  N. Etcoff,et al.  Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[27]  Billy Lee,et al.  Interpersonal Perception in Japanese and British Observers , 2004, Perception.

[28]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  James W Tanaka,et al.  An Encoding Advantage for Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2003, Perception.

[30]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  A. Young,et al.  Configural information in facial expression perception. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  T Landis,et al.  Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  V. Bruce,et al.  Remembering facial configurations , 1991, Cognition.

[34]  R. Campbell,et al.  FACE RECOGNITION AND LIPREADING , 1986 .

[35]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  T. Ito,et al.  Multiple Cues in Social Perception: The Time Course of Processing Race and Facial Expression. , 2007, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[37]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[39]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala , 1994, Nature.

[40]  Tzvi Ganel,et al.  Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: the parallel-route hypothesis revisited. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Development of face processing: the effect of face inversion. , 2000, Child development.

[42]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Discriminability effect on Garner interference: evidence from recognition of facial identity and expression , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[43]  D. Raab Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. , 1962, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. , 2001 .

[46]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between facial emotion and identity in face processing: Evidence based on redundancy gains , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[48]  E. McKone,et al.  Configural processing and face viewpoint. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[52]  R. Adolphs Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[53]  P. Ekman Facial expression and emotion. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[54]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[55]  Robert D. Jones,et al.  Severe Developmental Prosopagnosia in a Child With Superior Intellect , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[56]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Mathieu Gallay,et al.  The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[58]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Categorisation performance depends systematically on shape transformations , 2003 .

[59]  Jean-Yves Baudouin,et al.  When the smile is a cue to familiarity , 2000, Memory.

[60]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[61]  Sven Obermeyer,et al.  Differences between Old and Young Adults’ Ability to Recognize Human Faces Underlie Processing of Horizontal Information , 2012, Front. Ag. Neurosci.

[62]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .

[65]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information , 2009, NeuroImage.

[66]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  S. Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Configural Information in Gender Categorisation , 2006, Perception.

[70]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[71]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[72]  Michela Balconi,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Related to Normal and Morphed Emotional Faces , 2005, The Journal of psychology.

[73]  Daniel Fitousi,et al.  Variants of independence in the perception of facial identity and expression. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  F Theuveny,et al.  [The smile]. , 1987, Revue d'orthopedie dento-faciale.

[75]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[76]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  J. Townsend,et al.  On the costs and benefits of faces and words: process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  A M Burton,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[80]  K. Curby,et al.  Face to face with emotion: Holistic face processing is modulated by emotional state , 2012, Cognition & emotion.

[81]  N. Hadjikhani,et al.  A modulatory role for facial expressions in prosopagnosia , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  P. Feyereisen,et al.  A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.