The effects of offline events on online connective actions: An examination of #BoycottNFL using social network analysis

Abstract The proliferation of social media usage has changed the way individuals express public discourse regarding social issues. These expressions and interactions form a digitally networked connective action, where actors share information and ideas about a specific social issue absent of hierarchical leadership. Previous studies have proposed these connective actions are influenced by associated offline events but have neglected to examine the actors in the network and how the composition of the networks change. Through the lens of connective action logic, this research seeks to explore the effects of offline events on connective action participation and interactions between communities. Using content and social network analyses, this research examined #BoycottNFL, a connective action created to discontinue support of the National Football League. Findings suggest associated offline trigger events affect the diversity of actors participating in connective action and fostering interactions between actors and communities of diverse backgrounds. Implications are discussed in the context of organizational strategies for addressing social issues and harnessing the power of social media to transform connective actions.

[1]  Te-Lin Chung,et al.  Are You Connected Through Consumption? The Role of Hashtags in Political Consumption , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[2]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Who says what to whom on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[4]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Social movements and the ICT revolution , 2014 .

[5]  P. Burnap,et al.  Interaction and Transformation on Social Media: The Case of Twitter Campaigns , 2018 .

[6]  Bilal Alatas,et al.  A new direction in social network analysis: Online social network analysis problems and applications , 2019 .

[7]  Martijn van Zomeren,et al.  The social affirmation use of social media as a motivator of collective action , 2016 .

[8]  Dafne Muntanyola-Saura,et al.  Heterophily in social groups formation: a social network analysis , 2018, Quality & Quantity.

[9]  U. Brandes,et al.  Social network analysis in sport research: an emerging paradigm , 2017 .

[10]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  A Social Networks Approach to Online Social Movement: Social Mediators and Mediated Content in #FreeAJStaff Twitter Network , 2018 .

[11]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[12]  Kokil Jaidka,et al.  Do birds of different feather flock together? Analyzing the political use of social media through a language-based approach in a multilingual context , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Elena Pavan,et al.  The integrative power of online collective action networks beyond protest. Exploring social media use in the process of institutionalization , 2017, Technology, Media and Social Movements.

[14]  Dina Shatnawi,et al.  Gender and professional e-networks: Implications of gender heterophily on job search facilitation and outcomes , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[16]  Hsuan-Ting Chen,et al.  Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Aditya Johri,et al.  How Diverse Users and Activities Trigger Connective Action via Social Media: Lessons from the Twitter Hashtag Campaign #ILookLikeAnEngineer , 2018, HICSS.

[18]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[20]  Francis L. F. Lee,et al.  Examining the Connectedness of Connective Action: The Participant-Initiated Facebook Pages in Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement , 2018 .

[21]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[22]  Brian G. Knight,et al.  Homophily, Group Size, and the Diffusion of Political Information in Social Networks: Evidence from Twitter , 2014 .

[23]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[24]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  The development of structure in random networks: an analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure , 1981 .

[26]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection , 2014, New Media Soc..

[27]  Sifan Xu,et al.  Hashtag homophily in twitter network: Examining a controversial cause-related marketing campaign , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Pan Hui,et al.  Semantic homophily in online communication: Evidence from Twitter , 2016, Online Soc. Networks Media.

[29]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .