Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management

Abstract Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has received much attention from scholars and practitioners in the past years. It has become a method for simultaneous improvement of economic, social, and environmental performance. SSCM evaluation, therefore, is a significant duty for any types of organizations. Among evaluation methods, data envelopment analysis (DEA) seems to be an appropriate technique for assessment of the SSCM. One of the uses of DEA is to evaluate the efficiency of two-stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are intermediate measures that are considered as the inputs to the second stage. The resulting two-stage DEA models assess both the overall efficiency score of the whole process and each of the individual stages. Notwithstanding, there are major weaknesses in the previous extensions of two-stage DEA models. Firstly, a challenging issue is that suggestions for improvements are offered only for input and output measures, and intermediate measures are neglected. Although, some extensions for network structures take into account intermediate measures, they arbitrarily assign an input or output role for the measures, thus in optimal solution for inefficient DMUs, this measures are forced to respectively take a lower or upper amount. Secondly, the efficiency scores are calculated based on inputs and outputs. That is, while the models consider these measures by corresponding constraints, the intermediate measures are not included in the objective function, or incorrectly assign an input or output role. Thirdly, in some cases, the former developments specify points on the efficient frontier only for inefficient stages, while for a network which is entirely inefficient such points are also required. Moreover, the organization (which in DEA terminology is named decision making unit) is supposed to be divided into two autonomous departments. It means that the performance of one department is quite unrelated to another department, while from the organizational perspective this is called into the question. To overcome these shortcomings, in this paper, innovative models are proposed. The proposed ideas are used for evaluating the sustainability of supply chains in resin producing companies.

[1]  P. Glavič,et al.  How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability , 2005 .

[2]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  A. K. Dikshit,et al.  Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry , 2007 .

[4]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .

[6]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Donald J. Bowersox,et al.  Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process , 1974 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  M. Helms,et al.  Performance measurement for green supply chain management , 2005 .

[11]  Hean Tat Keh,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Grace Ding,et al.  Developing a multicriteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance , 2005 .

[14]  Majid Azadi,et al.  A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management , 2014 .

[15]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Concurrent estimation of efficiency, effectiveness and returns to scale , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[16]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yu-Chiun Chiou,et al.  Route-based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Estimating two-stage network Slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking , 2013 .

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Ismail Erol,et al.  A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain , 2011 .

[22]  Reza Farzipoor Saen Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009 .

[23]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[24]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement , 2001 .

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA , 2012 .

[27]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management , 2012 .

[30]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[31]  Chin-Wei Huang,et al.  Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[33]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..