Continuous One-Arm Kettlebell Swing Training on Physiological Parameters in US Air Force Personnel: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous one-arm kettlebell (KB) swing training on various US Air Force physical fitness testing components. Thirty trained male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) US Air Force (USAF) personnel volunteered and were sequentially assigned to one of three groups based on 1.5-mile run time: (1) KB one-arm swing training, (2) KB one-arm swing training plus highintensity running (KB + run), and (3) traditional USAF physical training (PT) according to Air Force Instruction 36-2905. METHODS The following measurements were made before and after 10 weeks of training: 1.5-mile run, 1-minute maximal push-ups, 1-minute maximal situps, maximal grip strength, pro agility, vertical jump, 40-yard dash, bodyweight, and percent body fat. Subjects attended three supervised exercise sessions per week for 10 weeks. During each exercise session, all groups performed a 10-minute dynamic warm-up followed by either (1) 10 minutes of continuous KB swings, (2) 10 minutes of continuous kettlebell swings plus 10 minutes of high-intensity running, or (3) 20 minutes of moderate intensity running plus push-ups and sit-ups. Average and peak heart rate were recorded for each subject after all sessions. Paired t tests were conducted to detect changes from pretesting to posttesting within each group and analysis of variance was used to compare between-group variability (ρ ≤ .05). RESULTS Twenty subjects completed the study. There were no statistically significant changes in 1.5-mile run time between or within groups. The 40- yard dash significantly improved within the KB swing (ρ ≤ .05) and KB + run group (ρ ≤ .05); however, there were no significant differences in the traditional PT group (ρ ≤ .05) or between groups. Maximal push-ups significantly improved in the KB + run group (ρ ≤ .05) and trends toward significant improvements in maximal push-ups were found in both the KB (ρ = .057) and traditional PT (ρ = .067) groups. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that continuous KB swing training may be used by airmen as a high-intensity, low-impact alternative to traditional USAF PT to maintain aerobic fitness and improve speed and maximal push-ups.

[1]  Comparison of Two-Hand Kettlebell Exercise and Graded Treadmill Walking: Effectiveness as a Stimulus for Cardiorespiratory Fitness , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  J. Serres,et al.  The influence of nontraditional training modalities on physical performance: review of the literature. , 2012, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Oxygen Cost of Kettlebell Swings , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[4]  Jason P. Lake,et al.  Kettlebell Swing Training Improves Maximal and Explosive Strength , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[5]  D. Spierer,et al.  Transference of Kettlebell Training to Strength, Power, and Endurance , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  J. Mayhew,et al.  Comparison of Kettlebell Swings and Treadmill Running at Equivalent Rating of Perceived Exertion Values , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  L. Brown,et al.  Effects of Weightlifting vs. Kettlebell Training on Vertical Jump, Strength, and Body Composition , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  K. Hansen,et al.  Kettlebell training for musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  C. Cisar,et al.  Effects of Kettlebell Training on Aerobic Capacity , 2015, Journal of strength and conditioning research.