BACKGROUND
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous one-arm kettlebell (KB) swing training on various US Air Force physical fitness testing components. Thirty trained male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) US Air Force (USAF) personnel volunteered and were sequentially assigned to one of three groups based on 1.5-mile run time: (1) KB one-arm swing training, (2) KB one-arm swing training plus highintensity running (KB + run), and (3) traditional USAF physical training (PT) according to Air Force Instruction 36-2905.
METHODS
The following measurements were made before and after 10 weeks of training: 1.5-mile run, 1-minute maximal push-ups, 1-minute maximal situps, maximal grip strength, pro agility, vertical jump, 40-yard dash, bodyweight, and percent body fat. Subjects attended three supervised exercise sessions per week for 10 weeks. During each exercise session, all groups performed a 10-minute dynamic warm-up followed by either (1) 10 minutes of continuous KB swings, (2) 10 minutes of continuous kettlebell swings plus 10 minutes of high-intensity running, or (3) 20 minutes of moderate intensity running plus push-ups and sit-ups. Average and peak heart rate were recorded for each subject after all sessions. Paired t tests were conducted to detect changes from pretesting to posttesting within each group and analysis of variance was used to compare between-group variability (ρ ≤ .05).
RESULTS
Twenty subjects completed the study. There were no statistically significant changes in 1.5-mile run time between or within groups. The 40- yard dash significantly improved within the KB swing (ρ ≤ .05) and KB + run group (ρ ≤ .05); however, there were no significant differences in the traditional PT group (ρ ≤ .05) or between groups. Maximal push-ups significantly improved in the KB + run group (ρ ≤ .05) and trends toward significant improvements in maximal push-ups were found in both the KB (ρ = .057) and traditional PT (ρ = .067) groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that continuous KB swing training may be used by airmen as a high-intensity, low-impact alternative to traditional USAF PT to maintain aerobic fitness and improve speed and maximal push-ups.
[1]
Comparison of Two-Hand Kettlebell Exercise and Graded Treadmill Walking: Effectiveness as a Stimulus for Cardiorespiratory Fitness
,
2014,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[2]
J. Serres,et al.
The influence of nontraditional training modalities on physical performance: review of the literature.
,
2012,
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.
[3]
J. Mayhew,et al.
Oxygen Cost of Kettlebell Swings
,
2010,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[4]
Jason P. Lake,et al.
Kettlebell Swing Training Improves Maximal and Explosive Strength
,
2012,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[5]
D. Spierer,et al.
Transference of Kettlebell Training to Strength, Power, and Endurance
,
2013,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[6]
J. Mayhew,et al.
Comparison of Kettlebell Swings and Treadmill Running at Equivalent Rating of Perceived Exertion Values
,
2012,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[7]
L. Brown,et al.
Effects of Weightlifting vs. Kettlebell Training on Vertical Jump, Strength, and Body Composition
,
2012,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[8]
K. Hansen,et al.
Kettlebell training for musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health: a randomized controlled trial.
,
2011,
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[9]
C. Cisar,et al.
Effects of Kettlebell Training on Aerobic Capacity
,
2015,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.