Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. VI. Genetic relations between performances in central test, on-farm test and commercial fattening

Abstract Data of the Dutch herdbook breeding programme and data obtained in an experimental progeny test of AI boars under commercial fattening conditions were used to estimate the genetic correlations between traits measured in central test and on-farm test (rG1), central test and commercial fattening (rG2) and on-farm test and commercial fattening (rG3). The genetic correlations were derived from the correlations between best linear unbiased predictions of breeding values in the different environments. A moderate genetic relationship was found between central and on-farm tests; for backfat thickness rG1 = 0.3−0.7, for daily gain rG1 = 0.3−0.65. Differences in definition of the traits and differences in sex of the progeny groups were only partly responsible for the moderate relationships. For identical traits measured in central and on-farm tests on progeny of the same sex rG1 = 0.41 for daily gain and rG1 = 0.70 for backfat thickness. No clear genetic relationship was found between daily gain in central test and commercial fattening (rG2 = −0.48 to 0.17). However, this correlation was moderately high for carcass characteristics (rG2 = 0.57−0.64). The genetic correlations between on-farm test and commercial fattening were high for daily gain, r G3 ≊ 1.0 , but low for carcass characteristics, r G3 ≊ 0 . It was concluded that the sire × herd interaction in on-farm test and commercial fattening results is the main factor responsible for the moderate genetic correlations between the different levels of the breeding programme.

[1]  J. Merks,et al.  Genotype x environment interactions in pig breeding programmes , 1988 .

[2]  J. Merks.  Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. I. Central test , 1986 .

[3]  J. Merks,et al.  Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. V. Genetic parameters and sire × herd interaction in commercial fattening , 1989 .

[4]  N. Standal.  Studies on Breeding and Selection Schemes in Pigs: VI. Correlation between Breeding Values estimated from Station Test and On-Farm-Test Data , 1977 .

[5]  R. Kempson,et al.  A comparison of ‘on-farm’ and station testing in pigs , 1977 .

[6]  J. K. Bertrand,et al.  Sire × Environment Interactions and Genetic Correlations of Sire Progeny Performance across Regions in Dam-Adjusted Field Data , 1987 .

[7]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Computing solutions to mixed model equations. , 1986 .

[8]  J. Merks.  Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. IV. Sire × herd interaction in on-farm test results☆ , 1988 .

[9]  J. Merks,et al.  Genotype environment interaction in pig breeding programmes: Methods of estimation and relevance of the estimates , 1985 .

[10]  J. Merks.  Genotype × environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. III. Environmental effects and genetic parameters in on-farm test , 1987 .

[11]  N. Standal.  Studies on Breeding and Selection Schemes in Pigs , 1968 .

[12]  E. H. Ketelaars.  De vererving van onder praktijkomstandigheden geregistreerde kenmerken bij varkens , 1979 .

[13]  R. E. McDowell,et al.  Genetic Aspects of Beef Production among Holstein-Friesians Pedigree Selected for Milk Production , 1973 .