Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the Zenith Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND Generous endograft oversizing has been associated with propensity for aortic neck dilation and subsequent device migration in endografts without suprarenal fixation. Effects of variable oversizing of endografts with suprarenal fixation have been poorly studied. METHODS Three hundred fifty-one patients underwent endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) in a prospective multicenter trial using the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft, a fully supported bifurcated 3-piece endograft with barb-enhanced suprarenal stent fixation. Blinded core-laboratory measurement of variables was prospectively recorded at predischarge and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after the procedure. Potential influence of endograft oversizing on subsequent aortic neck dilation (minor axis), aneurysm shrinkage (major axis), device migration, endoleak, rupture, open conversion, and death were retrospectively studied. Data are given as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS Risk of endograft migration (>5mm) at 12 months was 2.3% (6/261). However, patients with endograft oversizing of >30% had a 14% (4/29) migration risk compared with those oversized < or =30% (0.9%, 2/232), P <.002. There was zero device migration by the SVS definition (>10 mm or clinical event). Device oversizing >30% was associated with decreased AAA sac shrinkage (48% vs 77%) and with increased sac enlargement (9.5% vs 0.6%) at 24 months when compared with oversizing of < or =30%, respectively (P =.001). Incidence rate of any endoleak at 12 and 24 months was 8.2% (21/256) and 7.1% (12/169), respectively. Oversizing of endografts by >30% was associated with an increased type II endoleak rate (11 vs 4.7%) that failed to reach statistical significance (P =.27). Aortic neck diameters increased significantly by 6 months (P <.001) but then stabilized through 24 months; the absolute changes at 1 (n = 298), 6 (n = 278), 12 (n = 264), and 24 months (n = 171) were 0.66 +/- 0.10 mm (3.0%), 1.32 +/- 0.11 mm (5.6%), 1.38 +/- 0.12 mm (5.9%), and 1.44 +/- 0.16 mm (6.1%), respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated no correlation between endograft oversizing and aortic neck dilation at 12 (P =.86) or 24 months (P =.64). CONCLUSIONS Device migration and endoleaks were very infrequent after treatment with the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft. However, endograft oversizing of >30% was associated with an approximately 14-fold increase in device migration (>5 mm) at 12 months and with a approximately 16-fold increased risk of AAA expansion at 24 months. Although further follow-up will be essential to assess whether these early associations continue, avoidance of excessive endograft oversizing is recommended.

[1]  C. Zarins,et al.  Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  L. Reilly,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Zenith stent graft: short to midterm results. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Stent-Graft Migration following Endovascular Repair of Aneurysms with Large Proximal Necks: Anatomical Risk Factors and Long-term Sequelae , 2002, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[4]  F. Arko Regarding "Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: a cautionary note". , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  P. Harris,et al.  Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Stent attachment site-related endoleakage after stent graft treatment: An in vitro study of the effects of graft size, stent type, and atherosclerotic wall changes. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  C. Zarins The US AneuRx Clinical Trial: 6-year clinical update 2002. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  S. Money,et al.  Aortic Aneurysm Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Repair Is Device–dependent: A Comparison of Zenith and AneuRx Endografts , 2003, Annals of vascular surgery.

[9]  T. Resch,et al.  The impact of stent design on proximal stent-graft fixation in the abdominal aorta: an experimental study. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  Rodney A. White,et al.  Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  R. Green,et al.  An update of the Zenith endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial implantation and mid-term follow-up data. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  B. Hopkinson,et al.  The Zenith Aortic Stent-Graft: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience , 2002, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[13]  J. Matsumura,et al.  A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.